Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE ยป

Liberals head are gonna explode yo.

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

Consider it a twist on the old question about a tree falling in the forest with no one to hear it: If the House adopts articles of impeachment but never sends them to the Senate, is a president truly impeached?

A Harvard law professor, who also served as a Democrat-called impeachment witness, answered with a resounding โ€œnoโ€ in a column that speaks to the deep dilemma House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faces as she sits on two articles of impeachment against President Trump.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies ยป
4meAndyou ยท F
It's a technicality.

The Senate will end up going to trial without the articles, if necessary,if Trump insists and if that is what Trump really wants.

I've heard some theories that Pelosi is just trying to delay so that the culmination of the trial will be in November 2020. (She must be praying for a Hail Mary if that's the case). AND I've heard that she is trying to delay so that the Senate Dems running for President can attend the Iowa Caucus.

I've also heard that she hopes the Senate dems running for President will be spiked by her delays, so that the socialists won't have as much campaign time as Biden and Butigieg.

It's anybody's guess why she is doing this, but if she hopes to influence the way the Senate conducts an impeachment trial she hasn't got a prayer.