This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@BlueVeins You mean the President of the United States cannot fire any of the people that work for him, for any or no reason?
BlueVeins · 22-25
@sunsporter1649 Not if that staff member is the head of the FBI, and that reason is because of an investigation into himself. The politicization of law enforcement is a danger to checks and balances, and therefore to democracy itself.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@BlueVeins And of course the FBI spying on the Republicans is perfectly legal, right?
BlueVeins · 22-25
@sunsporter1649 The FBI is allowed to investigate likely criminal activity. If a Republican commits a likely crime, then they're allowed to go through their shit.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@BlueVeins Then why did they not investigate the democrats, since russian hacking of the dnc's computers was well known?
BlueVeins · 22-25
@sunsporter1649 Because the Democrats can't control who hacks their computers.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@BlueVeins LOL, no criminal activity in that case, right?
BlueVeins · 22-25
@sunsporter1649 Several counts of lying to investigators by administration staff and evidence of obstruction on the part of the President, himself.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@BlueVeins If the evidence is so overwhelming, why is it not in the articles of impeachment so prominently trumpeted today?
BlueVeins · 22-25
@sunsporter1649 Because the Democrats in Congress are pretty dumb.