This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
You people are sick taking shots at her. One of the most classy First Ladys we've ever had. It's one thing to slander a president. But his wife? You're disgusting!
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Cheekyshorts Yeah, but she's an immigrant. Remember?
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
Just being cheeky. And these are the only shots we take, unlike the Bernie Bro who shot up the congressional softball game.@Cheekyshorts
@MarkPaul so what?! Has nothing to do with pathetic comments toward her.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Cheekyshorts Well, we can't be sure of her loyalty... you know... because she's an immigrant. Remember?
daisymay · 51-55, T
@MarkPaul just because you twist select comments into an agenda doesn't make your arguments truth 🙄. If you can't see how a First Lady is off limits then you too are pathetic.
@daisymay oh I understand. I forgot that Michelle was the second coming of Jackie 🙄. Good grief!
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
@Cheekyshorts She married a monster for cash -- her own damn fault.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Cheekyshorts
I don't think you do, but maybe you can surprise me?
I didn't say anything about any other FLotUS, you did. And since you did, I'd like to point out that your girl, Melania, thought Michelle was so awesome that she plagiarized one of her speeches.
🤷♀️
oh I understand
I don't think you do, but maybe you can surprise me?
I didn't say anything about any other FLotUS, you did. And since you did, I'd like to point out that your girl, Melania, thought Michelle was so awesome that she plagiarized one of her speeches.
🤷♀️
@daisymay oh, another impeachable level offense I'm sure. Maybe you should let your highly ethical Schiff pile know about it. Oh never mind. I forgot that only Trump is unethical.
Btw, I didn't agree with Michelle's policy stances. But I never demeaned her personally either. Because she was there because of her husband. I hope you aren't supportive of the premise of the original post here.
Btw, I didn't agree with Michelle's policy stances. But I never demeaned her personally either. Because she was there because of her husband. I hope you aren't supportive of the premise of the original post here.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Cheekyshorts
Why do you think you can impeach a FLotUS? That's dumb.
You sure are saying a lot of words that don't address anything I've said.
Somehow I doubt this, seeing as you're whiteknighting this one so hard. 🤷♀️
oh, another impeachable level offense I'm sure
Why do you think you can impeach a FLotUS? That's dumb.
Maybe you should let your highly ethical Schiff pile know about it. Oh never mind. I forgot that only Trump is unethical.
You sure are saying a lot of words that don't address anything I've said.
But I never demeaned her personally either.
Somehow I doubt this, seeing as you're whiteknighting this one so hard. 🤷♀️
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Cheekyshorts We have had a lot of classy First Ladies, and I agree - picking on them is largely unnecessary and unwarranted. Btw, you’re making a dig at the past ones too, so you’re not exactly innocent here either.
Trump’s general hypocrisy about immigration and chain migration is a fair target, though.
Edit: you know, I misread you, sorry. I read “first classy ladies”. So never mind,
Trump’s general hypocrisy about immigration and chain migration is a fair target, though.
Edit: you know, I misread you, sorry. I read “first classy ladies”. So never mind,
LeopoldBloom · M
@Cheekyshorts We’re giving Melanoma the same respect that conservative shitbags gave to Michelle Obama.
@LeopoldBloom this conservative shitbag never personally attacked Michelle personally. She was a very elegant First Lady.
This is the problem, you fall into the same crap as other low lifes by admitting that you trash the First Lady in a personal fashion. As a principle, that practice is what's wrong, regardless of which side you're on.
This is the problem, you fall into the same crap as other low lifes by admitting that you trash the First Lady in a personal fashion. As a principle, that practice is what's wrong, regardless of which side you're on.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Cheekyshorts
Sure. You're a totally believable person.
this conservative shitbag never personally attacked Michelle personally
Sure. You're a totally believable person.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@daisymay That’s not exactly unbelievable. Lots of people find that behavior in poor taste no matter where it’s coming from.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@QuixoticSoul I've never been disappointed by not believing people on the Internet 🤷♀️
@daisymay well we agree on that premise. Sure. You're totally believable also. So touche.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@daisymay okay, here's my own material. Get lost, Libtard.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Cheekyshorts Weren't you virtue-signaling in this entire thread about how much of a better person you are than everyone because you don't make personal attacks?
I guess you're not actually a totally believable person after all. Weird.
I guess you're not actually a totally believable person after all. Weird.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
They called her Michael and said she had a bulge in her crotch. Joan Rivers even said she was transgender before she died due to complications from plastic surgery.@LeopoldBloom
LeopoldBloom · M
@AthrillatheHunt That’s what’s called a Second Amendment Solution. I thought you people approved of that. I guess only when your side does it.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
LeopoldBloom · M
@AthrillatheHunt Sorry, I meant to respond to @Cheekyshorts.