If these democats have such a strong case for impeachment

Then why are they hiding behind closed doors? Do it in public for all of us to see! I guess you can't do payoffs and give false testimony reports to the democrat owned Media on live TV can you?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

anythingoes477 · M

EVERY committee that is investigating SCROTUS has Republicans on it..EVERY SINGLE ONE. The only conspiracy that exists is on ultra right wing talk shows...and those are lies told by paid talk show hosts (ACTORS----NOT journalist) to get ratings....and suck in the gullible.

If you are looking for examples of exclusion----look at the impeachment proceedings that were held on Clinton. Those were held behind closed doors and no Dems whatsoever were allowed into the proceedings. The same occurred with votes on dismantling the ACA and passage of the tax scam. Both of those were held after midnight....and both were held during congressional recess---to make sure no Dems would be present. It's not like "the poor, poor Republicans got shut out and we never do that to the Dems". That would be the biggest fake news to date. I challenge you----show us where even one hearing into Comrade Trumpski and his Russian entourage he calls an administration was a shut out investigation attended by just Dems.

The Senate Intelligence Committee has FULL access to anything and everything that comes out of every single investigation---no matter who does it or what it is into-----if it affects the security and interests of America. And guess who is in charge of the Senate? Republican Moscow Mitch. Your comment shows just how uninformed you are about how government operates.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@anythingoes477 Once again, you are dead wrong.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/democrats-have-abandoned-clinton-impeachments-bipartisan-format

anythingoes477 · M

@sunsporter1649 Once AGAIN you are wrong. Dems are following the rules EXACTLY as set down by REPUBLICANS in 2017. That's what is galling the Repubes---having their own playbook used against them.- When the Repubes had a super majority in both Houses they changed the rules to deny Dems access to the preliminary hearings----all hearings. Since you are a right wing spin media addict---listen to Judge Napolitano tell the Fox actors who pass themselves off as journalists how wrong they are and what the actual facts are.....

https://news.yahoo.com/judge-napolitano-schools-fox-friends-152237558.html?soc_src=community&soc_trk=fb

And out of that dog and pony show that "stormed" the hearings as a dog and pony show for TV---12 of them had full access to the hearings anyway but wouldn't attend because it gave them 5 minutes of TV air time to be in the group outside in the hallway making asses of themselves.

"Hearings" and "investigations" have no obligation to be public. That was the Repube argument in 2017 when they changed the rules to exclude Dems. However this time there was no exclusion of Repubes. There was 6 Repubes in that room and seats for 12 more Republicans who chose to be out in the hallway mugging in front of a TV camera than be in the hearings to actually be a part of the process. Impeachment was not going on inside of that room---------INVESTIGATION of facts were...period. INVESTIGATION to see if enough facts and precedent existed to go public with ARTICLES of Impeachment.

That clown show in the hallway was just that---a clown show by idiots that set the rules that said "preliminary investigations" should be private.......but did't like it when the rules they set to screw Dems came back and slammed them in the ass.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@anythingoes477 You keep believing that, it amuses us

anythingoes477 · M

@sunsporter1649 It amused the shit out of everyone watching the FOX crew who was listening to Nepolitano too. The more they tried to spin shit and inject their agenda the more the Judge just kept telling them there were wrong.

You're a trumper's trumper. 😂 In the face of facts you simply deny they exist. In print..on video.......don't matter. If facts contradict whatever crap it is that you want to believe---crap wins. Things like truth amuses you.....but then I'm guessing you could have a ball mentally staring at a bottle cap.