How soon until the next investigation of the same thing?

NEWSFLASH: 18 October 2019 The Republican controlled State Department concluded its investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's use of private email server, finding that though there was no deliberate mishandling of classified information, 38 current or former employees violated security procedures, a report released Friday indicated.

[i]These findings can't make Baby-trump happy. What would an investigation of his and his family's handling of security matters find? [/i]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

MethDozer · M

So again the evidence is she did it.

MarkPaul · 26-30, M

@MethDozer Yes. But, we already knew that and... the same question remains... did what exactly that is worthy of 3 successive investigations that reach the same conclusion?

MethDozer · M

@MarkPaul fair enough.

The question is why she is allowed to get away with it.

MarkPaul · 26-30, M

@MethDozer The same reason Ivanka and Jared get away with doing the same thing she did. The same reason Baby-trump is getting away with his activities which are actually "deliberate mishandling." At least for now...

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@MethDozer Because it doesn't rise to the level of criminality. These kinds of violations usually don't. They're typically resolved by internal department disciplinary procedures, not the courts - or simply ignored after someone is retired.

MethDozer · M

@QuixoticSoul 🙄....that's a problem

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@MethDozer No, not really 🤷‍♂️

DukeOfEarle · M

Another retarded comment. Using unsecured servers is not a problem? Why don’t you give us your bank account number. We promise to deposit money in there. 😂 @QuixoticSoul

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@DukeOfEarle You're determined to be an idiot, it seems, literally can't even follow a simple conversation 😂

MethDozer · M

@QuixoticSoul Fuck Yeah it is. Politicians should be held to higher standard than ordinary citizens, not a lower one.

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@MethDozer They’re simply held to the same one. Breaking regulations is typically not criminal. In this latest State dept probe a few dozen people were discovered violating guidelines - not a single one in a way that merited recommending criminal charges.

DukeOfEarle · M

Being called an idiot by an idiot is quite an oxymoron, which describes you to the T. @QuixoticSoul

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@DukeOfEarle Maybe revisit the definition of oxymoron.

DukeOfEarle · M

Yes. You should. Glad to see you’re starting to figure it out. @QuixoticSoul

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@DukeOfEarle Tidy, you're getting bootyblasted about being called in idiot, in the process of being too stupid to use a dictionary correctly. Thank your lucky stars - if you weren't so retarded, the irony of this situation would strike you dead.

MethDozer · M

@QuixoticSoul Same standard? Lmao.

Yeah, sure. Go compromise security by not following federal regulations and see how you do.

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@MethDozer State dept just pinched 38 people doing it. Nobody got criminally charged.

MethDozer · M

@QuixoticSoul Fucked up. Really fucked up. But a joint or some unclaimed earnings gets you sent to jail.

Backwards ass nonsense.

But again, elected officials should be held to higher standard, it should be harsher sentences for everything if you're and elected official. How compromising security by not following regulations isn't criminal is beyond logic. Especially for an official.

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M

@MethDozer Hillary wasn't an elected official in the context of this situation either.

MethDozer · M

@QuixoticSoul Touche,good catch.

Still, working in those positions..
Should be a much higher standard. Why that isn't worthy of any tangible punishment other than a " don't do that again" is baffling.