This is how you know the political left is completely unhinged...

@cherokeepatti mean and stupid

@lovelywarpedlemon [b][c=#008099]Stupid, is voting democrat knowing full well that they will bring suffering, death, immorality, civil unrest, racial tension, destructive multiculturalism as opposed to constructive diversity, flourishing drug trade, flourishing human trafficking trade, flourishing gang violence, dangerous global political tensions, economic stagnation and eventual failure, diseases that haven't been seen since the middle ages, oppression, loss of constitutional freedoms, Orwellian social engineering, continued infanticide holocaust, possible eugenics, an over burdened social welfare system, and a totalitarian police state.[/c][/b]

@puck61 It's so easy to blame someone else isn't it?

@lovelywarpedlemon Yes, I also blame a lack of rain for the recent drought.

@puck61 In case you have not noticed, [b]any[/b] human being is capable of those destructive actions which you mentioned.

@SubstantialKick The dems have shown overwhelmingly clearly that this is what they will do. Bubonic plague, typhus, tuberculosis, has already been found in the leftist utopias of LA, San Francisco and Seattle. They ignore the obvious 'side effects' of building their illegal alien voting block, they already practice 'group think' and suppress free speech, and they just love killing babies..... the list goes on and on and on and on....just like the energizer bunny! It is as plain as day that the democrat party as become a force for evil. Shit Oh Dear! They even look evil at this point. Anyone who doesn't walk away from this 4th Reich is very sick.

@puck61 Are you crazy? What the heck are you even talking about? 🤣

@SubstantialKick The evil insanity of the leftist pus pocket filth.

@puck61 So the right/conservatives are perfect, huh? They never screw up or make any mistakes whatsoever? Okay, gotcha.

@SubstantialKick Sure they do, but they are not deliberately destructive. The dems obviously hate this country and want to destroy it. Actions speak louder than words, and there are many millions who can plainly see that these demon possessed freaks that are calling themselves "democrats" are launching an all 0ut attack on this country.

@SubstantialKick nope! That's where y'all get fucked up.

Republicans suck too!!

But mostly because they've adopted alot of the same victim culture crap that the left has...

And that they're also Big Business and Big Government and Big Spending*.

@lovelywarpedlemon the whole democratic left philosophy is based on blaming other people!!! Lmao!

@GardenSage Blaming the nature of human beings to fail on other human beings? Lol! 🤣

@SubstantialKick I'm sorry but how I'm reading what you wrote isn't making sense... Maybe it's me. Could you reword to have more brevity thanks

@GardenSage There is a renown psychologist who made that observation a long time ago!

Turns out liberals are the real authoritarians.

A political-science journal that published an oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more likely to show traits associated with “psychoticism” now says it got it wrong. Very wrong.

The American Journal of Political Science published a correction this year saying that the 2012 paper has “an error” — and that liberal political beliefs, not conservative ones, are actually linked to psychoticism.

“The interpretation of the coding of the political attitude items in the descriptive and preliminary analyses portion of the manuscript was exactly reversed,” the journal said in the startling correction.

“The descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck’s psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal; and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative.”

In the paper, psychoticism is associated with traits such as tough-mindedness, risk-taking, sensation-seeking, impulsivity and authoritarianism.






The social-desirability scale measures people’s tendency to answer questions in ways they believe would please researchers, even if it means overestimating their positive characteristics and underestimating negative ones.

The erroneous report has been cited 45 times, according to Thomson Reuters Web of Science.

Brad Verhulst, a Virginia Commonwealth University researcher and a co-author of the paper, said he was not sure who was to blame.

“I don’t know where it happened. All I know is it happened,” he told Retraction Watch, a blog that tracks corrections in academic papers. “It’s our fault for not figuring it out before.”

The journal said the error doesn’t change the main conclusions of the paper, which found that “personality traits do not cause people to develop political attitudes.”

But professor Steven Ludeke of the University of Southern Denmark, who pointed out the errors, told Retraction Watch that they “matter quite a lot.”

“The erroneous results represented some of the larger correlations between personality and politics ever reported; they were reported and interpreted, repeatedly, in the wrong direction,” he said.

@puck61 you should make that its own post.

@GardenSage Do you think I should delete it as a matter of etiquette?

@puck61 heck no. It's why I marked the comment at the root of this thread "best answer"!

@puck61 NoOoOOo!
The drought is MY Fault! 😒
😣 I closed the wrong valve!

@GardenSage Oh! Thanks a lot!

@Th1nkF1rst Damn you! Daaaaaaammmmmnnnnnn Yoooooouuuuuuuu!

@puck61[i][big] hey chill! [/big][/i]

I went and fixed it! [u]Just Now![/u]

Instead of 0.87325%
I turned up to 162.449%

[i]There was a LOT of weird noises, grinding, and something Screamed! [/i]

@Th1nkF1rst Oh great! There goes Smallville! 🥺