@St0ut I don't think the really solid line is, Russia didn't help, or even that no one asked Russia to help, as much as the ideas that anything is ok as long as it's for a just cause, and everybody breaks the law, so our guy should be able to as well.
shouldn't that be two questions: 1) was there collusion? 2) was there credible evidence?
unless you have him on tape (Nixon) or he put something in writing ...may not be evidence.
sounds like there was all sort of dirty politics on both sides - but then with all that power and money involved, anyone that believes that either side played above board and honorable is pretty naive (in my not so humble opinion).
Why can't democrats, who are swallowing the kool aid of Russian influence, realise that it's the democratic party who hold way more responsibility for trumpkins getting voted in than Russian propaganda. Time to look in the mirror.
And while we are at it why aren't republicans, supporters not party because it's obvious why the party love a regime change, (and establishment democrats) getting their knickers in a twist over the overt meddling by trumpkins and his cohorts in the democracy of another country?