Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Ah good. Trump is undermining the justice system.

John Roberts disagrees, but good news! Thanks to Trump's clarification that judges are political, we can freely ignore the judgments of the judges he appointed.

MAGA!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
redredred · M
We can understand the leftard rulings from the 9th circuit in light of the President's obvious statement that judges are political. Only an idiot or an apologist would assert otherwise.
lorne13 · 61-69, M
@redredred but what makesno sense at all is the rantings of the trumpanzee
redredred · M
you mean his 100% accurate observation that judges are political? Why am i not surprised that that doesnt make sense to you?@lorne13
WoodyAq · M
@redredred Thanks for the clarification. We don't have to listen to anything Kavanaugh says...

Glad we cleared that up.
lorne13 · 61-69, M
@redredred sure does, trumpie sees everyting in terms of his own importance so of course he thinks the only thing that matters is his own political stupid tweets
redredred · M
Unless youre the defendent( a growing likelihood in my view) you dont have to accept anything a judge says as apolitical. @WoodyAq
redredred · M
Does that self importance differ from any other president in the last hundred years or so?@lorne13
WoodyAq · M
@redredred Yes, it does. All of them, with maybe a pre-war exception stood for something: ideas or values, that extended beyond their own ego.

The only thing Trump stands for that isn't himself (the only non-Trump thing he speaks about with passion) is his bigotry.
redredred · M
if you think the vast bulk of presidents in the last hundred years or so stood for anything except their self-aggrandizement you are exactly thesort of foolish naif they want to attract in re-election worthy quantities.

Im sorry to tell you this but theres no santa claus, no easter bunny and that bridge for sale isnt owned by the seller. @WoodyAq
WoodyAq · M
@redredred Ronald Reagan stood for individual freedom worldwide and less government at home; Lyndon Johnson stood for "the Great Society"; FDR pushed the New Deal; Woodrow Wilson had his principles to construct a peaceful world order in the wake of the first world war ... etc. All these ideas were greater than the presidential egos that backed them.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@WoodyAq But that was before the America of the Flag and the monuments was sold to the highest bidder and stopped being the land of opportunity. Time to move on. The Gold Rush is over. Trump is just a symptom of the desperation of the people for a life thats not coming back.
WoodyAq · M
@whowasthatmaskedman Trump's election is a symbol. The man himself stands for things that, if adopted, would change the way America works. And not for the better.
redredred · M
lyndon johnson was a lying murderous bastard who sent thousands of young americans to their deaths in Vietnam to no purpose because he was too egotistical to pull out of a no-win situation. He backed the great society (a budget buster were still paying for) and related civil rights legislation so he could have, and i quote, " Those N_____s voting democrat for 200 years". FDR Ordered the destruction of millions of dollars worth of agricultural product to drive up food prices while millions starved. He had essentially no understanding of economics and his floundering unnecessarily extended the great depression by at least seven years. Wilson ran for re-election promising to keep us out of WWI and then promptly committed troops once he won. He railed against the strictures of the Constitution while president of Princeton and later ignored the rules of presidential succession while he suffered a debilitating stroke and let his wife serve as de facto president.

They all ruled with only their own interest in mind and were monsters by any measure @WoodyAq
WoodyAq · M
@redredred Your last paragraph doesn't follow logically from the ones preceding it, which present a pretty skewed view of history.
redredred · M
no it doesn't@WoodyAq
WoodyAq · M
@redredred what, doesn't follow? That's what I said.
redredred · M
You mistakenly claimed my last paragraph gave a skewed view of history. I said it doesn't. The rest of your comment was equally wrong.

Is English your first language?
WoodyAq · M
@redredred Nope. I claimed your last paragraph doesn't follow from the ones that preceded it, which (meaning the paragraphs that preceded it) give a skewed view of history. But that issue is independent of the non sequitur issue.

So apparently English is not your first language?
redredred · M
it is if its written properly, work on that.@WoodyAq
WoodyAq · M
@redredred Okay, that's not English.
redredred · M
listen, ive spent too much time on you, just do what most people probably tell you most of the time and fuck off.@WoodyAq
WoodyAq · M
@redredred So much time to say so little...