Change my mind

Restrictions on ownership of nuclear weapons are completely unconstitutional, I agree.

Not really commenting on the overall topic, but I would point out that virtually all citizens agree that there is an implicit limit to the right to bear arms. No real portion of the population believes that individuals should have the right to thermonuclear weapons or aircraft carriers or attack submarines. Basically there is a largely implicit consensus that the scope of the second amendment is limited somewhere in the realm of small arms. Likewise, the freedom of expression was never extended to things like treason, inciting disorder, and defamation, although the legal standard to prove any of those is quite strict. The 1st amendment has a highly expansive scope.

banning firearms is a violation of the 2nd amendment. i fail to see how banning a reporter from the white house counts a violation of freedom of speech?

If trump is hitler why give him your guns..

When an illegal kills someone with a gun.. the news goes silent because anti gun and pro immigrant reporting would cancel each other out..

Banning a reporter in what way?

You could argue the point, but no one serious is calling for an absolute ban of firearms (firearms not being specified in the condition, by the way). Regulation is in no way an infringement and is so stated in the same document.

All depends on the arm and the reporter, I guess, not to mention the facts and circumstances.

There's a reason we have a supreme court. If all lawyers were always right there would be no need. I think Trump handled it perfectly. That narcissistic pos won't be called on in my lifetime. lol

I shall but first I'll have to give you brain damage

You cannot have too many murders. Ever.