@SW-User
OK, fine. As an American yourself, what would you like to see change that might actually guard against unspeakable events like Uvalde, Sandy Hook, Columbine, etc.
As already stated, the name of the game is compromise and cooperation. So that would likely encompass a variety of ideas from both sides including:
Restrictions on assault style rifles and weapons
Restrictions on high capacity magazines and lethal bullets
"Smart guns"
National initiative to collect data to identify and intervene on individuals who might be planning a gun violence event(red flag laws)
Closing loopholes that allow individuals to not register their guns
Increasing the age at which a person can buy an assault rifle or other types of mass killing weapons.
This of course would require a complete do over of the current political environment which revels in blaming the other side, promising to change things if elected, then never fulfilling those promises. And every 2-4 years we complete the same dance.
That's deflection. You know as well as I do that unspeakable things happen everywhere in the world
It's not "deflection", I am not trying to dismiss your argument, I'm calling you out for your hysteria regarding these children in Texas and suggesting you gain some perspective on the issue.
The fact is, at this moment in time, the NRA see Republican politicians as the best way of maintaining the status quo, re guns, just as they doubtless did with Democrats in the past. With pressure building to enact meaningful gun control, the Republicans, at this precise moment in time, can follow their principles and enact some bipartisan legislation that maybe, just maybe, will save some innocent lives. At this moment in time, they are choosing not to.
I would again call your attention to previous school shootings in the past during Democrat administrations. They chose to do little to nothing, and of course scapegoated the Republicans and NRA for the problem then as well.
Did you know America passed assault weapon laws in the 90's?
1994
Tucked into the sweeping and controversial Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, signed by President Clinton in 1994, is the subsection titled Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act. This is known as the assault weapons ban — a temporary prohibition in effect from September of 1994 to September of 2004. Multiple attempts to renew the ban have failed.
The provisions of the bill outlawed the ability to “manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon,” unless it was “lawfully possessed under Federal law on the date of the enactment of this subsection.” Nineteen military-style or “copy-cat” assault weapons—including AR-15s, TEC-9s, MAC-10s, etc.—could not be manufactured or sold. It also banned “certain high-capacity ammunition magazines of more than ten rounds,” according to a U.S. Department of Justice Fact Sheet.
It expired and we haven't attempted to compromise on the issue since. That includes the tail end of the Clinton Administration as well as Obama's administration, both Democrats.
I notice that you're all about "indoctrination". Are you immune from indoctrination? What sources do you rely on? Are they across the political spectrum... (again not a challenge).
I'm all about pointing out the lies and propaganda that people on here spew as their own, when in fact it comes from authoritative sources that they trust. My focus is to call that out and question how much of what they said they actually thought through and validated through critical thinking.
I read Reuters, AP and news aggregates for general news. I read BBC and Al Jazeera for other perspectives and opinions and I subscribe to several journalists on Substack that I have chosen to trust including Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, and Michael Tracy.
No, I am not immune from "indoctrination" but I've consoled myself with the fact that many times I am correct about things that take a long time to come to light...some recent examples include: the ineffectiveness of the Covid 19 vaccines in
preventing the spread of Covid, the authenticity of the Hunter Biden laptop, the political witch hunt that sought to demonstrate that Trump was a Russian asset.
Additionally I am willing to admit I am wrong at times..recent example: I did not believe the West when they said Russia's invasion of Ukraine was imminent, I assumed it was a political ploy to put pressure on Russia..well I was wrong about that...
ok chill out. I'm doing my best. I vote Green, I'm a vegetarian, I donate to charities, I occasionally volunteer for community projects. Relax (and note my apology at the top)
I am relaxed. We are just talking here. I use strong words and phrases to portray my passion and interest, I am not angry with you and am not upset by your beliefs and statements...doesn't mean I agree, but I am not upset. 😉