Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Never understood how some people boil down everything to raw talent that you're born with...

I mean, sure, people have different cognitive abilities, different strengths and weaknesses, etc (like a DnD Campaign, lol)

and I can understand how people can conclude that someone is a very "talented" musician or artist because humans have been around for a long time and us humans have been into music and art for a long time...

but here's the kicker, computers have been around for less than a 100 years or so,
so how the heck can someone be a "talented" computer programmer?

no, they are SKILLED because they worked their @ss off to get good.

No one fell out of their mum being able to do that.

sure, there might be some young kids who seem to have talent for music or art, but you look at their environment, they are usually surrounded by people with the same set of skills, so they're just learning from their surrounding environment, lol

sorry for the rant, I'm kinda passionate about this topic because it's kinda sad to see people give up or not even try because they think they don't have "talent"
Top | New | Old
ArishMell · 70-79, M
The skilled programmer - or anyone else with a modern skill - must have the basic talent to learn the sort of skills necessary. That the knowledge did not exist in the past does not matter because each new individual sees it anew anyway.

As you say, no-one is borne with specific talents. Rather, I think, we all have innate abilities for certain types of learning. The programmer might equally well have become a mathematician, for example.

Environment must play a part as you say, but I am not sure if it necessary that those around you are in the same fields. Perhaps an environment that fosters and encourages learning and skill, irrespective of what those are, is more important than one full of specialists in just one discipline.

I may be wrong, as I am not a neuro-scientist, but I also believe we all have natural limits to what we can learn, and to what level.

You might write very simple computer programmes in C++ or BASIC, but never be able to develop Internet-server level skill.

You might passably pick out the slow "Moonlight" melody from Beethoven's "Moonlight Sonata" (not actually his title for it) but could never progress to being an international concert pianist.

You might get by in fractured school-level French while on holiday in France, but never be able to learn languages to international journalism, science or diplomacy level.

Some might learn Mathematcis to stratospheric heights if complexity but be hopeless at singing, say; yet the operatic star be nearly innumerate. While others can barely learn what (a+b)(a+b) equal and be so bad at singing they might make the charts.

Once reaching that level it is impossible to proceed further, but , I think, what categories of ability we have, and their heights, are individual to the person.


You have a point about giving up, but if you are in that position, it becomes fruitless striving to learn something your brain cannot process. Some people are lazy, yes, but not everyone; and there comes a point where further struggle is not worth it.
Fishy · 36-40, F
@ArishMell Yeah, I'm not really saying everyone will be the next Beethoven if they practice hard enough,

but it's just sad seeing people who really want to do something but they give up,

but a little bit of encouragement goes a long way, I've seen people get motivated to a point where they might have well been on fire when they're shown how to do something they didn't think possible
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Fishy I think how anyone is taught can be a major point.

Mathematics was always my weakest subject because I have no innate talent for it; but worsened by two particular teachers at school. It was anyway taught as an abstraction with a school-leaving examination in mind. Not something with many everyday real-world uses despite a few, rather contrived examples in the text-books.

However, I managed to understand some of the topics the Maths syllabus covered, eventually by encountering them in real life and seeing them in different ways.

On the other hand I could never play a musical instrument, or sing, because I am tone-deaf.
You can be a talented programmer when you can use it to solve problems well / at all that others can't do / haven't done / haven't thought to do.

Abilities needed for doing it can indeed be inherent / "falling out of your mum" (which description explains a lit of being "British"...! ☺🤣). It has zero to do with how long something has been around.

But native abilities vary and can be nurtured or not. Sometimes, people DO grow up in families who are skilled / versed in <x>...and sometimes not.

Encouraging others can be done without trying to cut down people of ability.
CrazyMusicLover · 31-35
It's true though. 😑 My brother has an in-built calculator. Of course he had to learn lots of stuff but not having to consciously compute gets you to do stuff incomparably faster than a regular human.

The problem with people who give up is that they compare themselves to people like this.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@CrazyMusicLover I wonder how many of those compare themselves to others, have been conditioned by that cruel old lie, "anyone can do it, just put your mind to it" to struggle with something they genuinely cannot do.

Rather than be helped develop their own talents elsewhere.

So of course they give up - they have no alternative.
CrazyMusicLover · 31-35
@ArishMell One of the biggest factor in developing someone's confidence is how individual talents/skills are valued by society they live in. For example I was talented in visual arts as a kid but coming to school and seeing how little value the art had I could never recognize it as something to be proud of or even worth putting a lot of effort into building skills. In contrast to my brother who had the most valued talent I never got over feeling inferior. Art is something everyone wants to have for free and if they won't get it, they don't mind doing it themselves in poorer quality, however, most people think twice about not hiring an accountant to have their taxes done. Which makes sense.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@CrazyMusicLover I agree. It probably varies from country to country and culture to culture, but all too often some skills are valued and others devalued, or at least ignored.

We've seen in the UK, cuts in funding resulting in schools teaching little or no music, or dropping science subjects like geology. Those cuts are fuelled by a blinkered worship of "STEM" subjects: "Science, Technology, E and Mathematics; but I am not sure what "Technology" is supposed to mean, nor do I know if the "E" is for "English" or "Engineering".

The word or concept "Engineer" is sadly very undervalued in Britain, but if you want to call yourself an "Engineer" professionally in Germany, where it is greatly respected, you need be very highly educated. Engineering is a highly scientific and mathematical discipline - not mending washing-machines! There are many such people - Chartered Engineers - in Britain but you hardly ever hear journalists, politicians and many lay-people recognise that fact.


I think too, the money, sports and entertainments trades exert a powerful attraction because you don't need be very bright to make a lot of money from them, at least for a short time before you run out of creativity or popularity. You really have to dedicated to succeed properly in the arts and sports; though at least the arts can offer a full-length career rather than just a few peak years. You might need certain talents, not necessarily "technical" ones either, but the public face often suggests easy money compared to three or four years' study to gain a Degree, then the gamble of finding well-paid employment worthy of it.

Or for sheer idleness and no talent, why not advertise cosmetics on social-media - as a so-called "influencer"? They apparently earn good money for merely parroting a script while pretending not to be associated with the company. Sometimes I wonder how, in Britain at least, they manage their Income Tax and National "Insurance" affairs, unless the employer does that for them.

Or sling together any old sampled rubbish in the guise of music, and publish it via streaming-services which I think do pay royalties, though not very highly. There, you don't even need know a crotchet from a quaver or be able to sing the Tonic Solfa in pitch.

So with temptations like those, are many young people deterred from making any real effort to learn anything worthwhile? Why struggle when laziness can pay?
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
This is a quote I have lived by throughout my career. I think others might find it helpful.😷

“Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan Press On! has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.
22Michelle · 70-79, T
The "nature v nurture" debate. And probably a bit of both, but certainly nurture plays a big part. Not only if you're brought up by parents who are maths or science, etc skilled, but how much they teach you, encourage you to develop your skills / talents. And part of that may be accepting your inate talent may be different from theirs.
Rolexeo · 26-30, M
Nothing new under the sun, the tasks computers perform have always existed but were performed manually. It wouldn't be possible to create a computer if that wasn't the case. Anyone can improve at something but some have more potential than others.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
ShenaniganFoodie · 36-40, M
What if, your mum made you start playing from the age of 10 ??????

5 years made to do it,,,,,, 9 years wanted to do it

[media=https://youtu.be/fUCgwHGnhJY]
Fishy · 36-40, F
@ShenaniganFoodie I remember someone telling me once: that people start to really enjoy something once they understand it, and once something becomes intuitive enough where they don't have to put much thought into what they're doing.

So you probably enjoy it now because it's something that's become a second nature flow-state
ShenaniganFoodie · 36-40, M
@Fishy
[media=https://vocaroo.com/1eNtONCItK1q]
[media=https://vocaroo.com/1c3S9vcBjwCD]
[media=https://vocaroo.com/1oFR3x1AFI12]

 
Post Comment