Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

You had to have 🍒the size of softballs to get inside one of these in 1882 and dive into the deep ocean

Just absolutely no regard for your own life lol
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
Interesting photos - thankyou!

They didn't dive very deep with those things! Just as well.

That leather one looks like someone's attempt to make a diving-suit privately; not a professional design at all even for 1882. Presumably it was at least trialled, but how successfully?

For the British-invented and made, Siebe Gorman hard-hat suit, with its characteristic spherical copper helmet fitted to a rubberised-canvas overall suit with sealed, weighted boots, was already in production and use. One such use was early in 1880, in the desperately sad task of recovering the bodies and clearing the wreckage of the Tay [railway] Bridge Disaster on New Year'sEve, 1879.

........

The second photograph's rigid-panel suit had a modern - and considerably sleeker, safer and effective - version in the 1970s, the JIM suit, originally for the developing North Sea oil-industry. Its operating depth was many hundreds of feet, not the two or three tens likely the safe limit of that 1882 suit.

Invented by Mike Humphrey and Mike Borrow of Underwater Marine Equipment Ltd (of Britain), it was inspired by an earlier suit invented by Joseph Perress, who assisted UMEL in this project. It was called the JIM suit after Perress' chief diver.

I understand some of the tests in England used a specially-built, water-filled pressure-vessel. The diver inside the suit was detailed to perform some simple mechanical-assembly tasks in the tank to verify sufficient flexibility, grip etc. I think the gauntlets were more hand-like, not the claw and hook on that early hard-suit, and a typical test task was bolting some pieces of steel together.