Over and Under Number of Lies Trump Will Tell During the Debate
I'm going to say over 50 not counting the ones he tells more than once. What's your guess.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SomeMichGuy · M
SomeMichGuy · M
@houseonfire Those were from Republicans. lol
houseonfire · 56-60, M
@SomeMichGuy oh yea right sure yea of course they were.
SomeMichGuy · M
@houseonfire You don't remember the story? It was well-publicized.
But during the Jan 6 Cmte hearings, DJT's lawyer for any voting irregularities testified that he "ran every story to ground, and found no irregularity that would change the outcome."
And that agrees with the reports from the states.
There's no "there" there.
And DJT finally admitted it three times.
But during the Jan 6 Cmte hearings, DJT's lawyer for any voting irregularities testified that he "ran every story to ground, and found no irregularity that would change the outcome."
And that agrees with the reports from the states.
There's no "there" there.
And DJT finally admitted it three times.
houseonfire · 56-60, M
@SomeMichGuy sending in an early ballot for a dead person does not show up as an irregularity. Go watch back tapes of Louder for Crowder where he shows voting from the dead the incarcerated and others things that did not come up as an irregularity.
SomeMichGuy · M
@houseonfire No, I'll believe the actual election officials.
The only way dead ppl can vote NOW is if the rolls aren't kept up-to-date.
Jimmy Carter got into politics because it was common to allow spouses to vote for their deceased spouse for years after they died.
The only way dead ppl can vote NOW is if the rolls aren't kept up-to-date.
Jimmy Carter got into politics because it was common to allow spouses to vote for their deceased spouse for years after they died.
houseonfire · 56-60, M
@SomeMichGuy irregularities oops i missed that https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/wisconsin-loophole-allows-nearly-150-000-to-vote-without-showing-photo-id/ar-AA1qgE4g?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=032f8cac8a454ec2994e71c12fed8ab4&ei=34
ElwoodBlues · M
@houseonfire And can you show us a SINGLE illegal vote cast by someone with Wisconsin's 'indefinitely confined' status status?? I didn't think so. Wisconsin did a careful recount, plus a republican review. tRump lost fair and square.
In Wisconsin, a recount slightly improved Biden’s victory over Trump by 87 votes, increasing Biden’s statewide lead to 20,682, or 0.6 percentage points. A nonpartisan audit that concluded a year after the election made recommendations on how to improve future elections in Wisconsin but did not uncover evidence of widespread voter fraud in the state, leading the Republican co-chair of the audit committee to declare that “the election was largely safe and secure.” The state’s Assembly speaker, a Republican, ordered a separate review, which a state judge said found “absolutely no evidence of election fraud.”
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@ElwoodBlues No, but he'll still go on claiming it's true.
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
@SomeMichGuy why? Afraid of the truth? Or does facts make you nauseous?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment