See if you can spot the glaringly obvious error :)
This has been bothering me ever since I first saw it. I know, in the grand scheme of things it might not really be all that important, but...for me it is!
Walz's. Walz's. WALZ'S?
No! Just no! Don't these people understand under what circumstances an apostrophe (i.e. inverted comma) is used? Who approved these tops? Obviously someone who doesn't understand English punctuation very well. Maybe they got one of those illegal aliens from across the southern border to come up with this design. 😂
Here's a link to a guide they could use. https://editorsmanual.com/articles/apostrophes-in-plurals/
Walz's. Walz's. WALZ'S?
No! Just no! Don't these people understand under what circumstances an apostrophe (i.e. inverted comma) is used? Who approved these tops? Obviously someone who doesn't understand English punctuation very well. Maybe they got one of those illegal aliens from across the southern border to come up with this design. 😂
Here's a link to a guide they could use. https://editorsmanual.com/articles/apostrophes-in-plurals/