SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
View 5 more replies »
DogMan · 61-69, M
@SunshineGirl If you watched his videos you would see that people cannot reply, they just run because
they know they are busted committing fraud.
What COULD they say when you knock on a locked door during business hours and you can see
they have no kids in their day care, but their paperwork says they have over 100 kids per day, which
is what they get paid for. This is why they run and hide their faces. They know they are commiting
fraud. And they know Democrats will protect them and go after the whistle blower.
they know they are busted committing fraud.
What COULD they say when you knock on a locked door during business hours and you can see
they have no kids in their day care, but their paperwork says they have over 100 kids per day, which
is what they get paid for. This is why they run and hide their faces. They know they are commiting
fraud. And they know Democrats will protect them and go after the whistle blower.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
@DogMan I applaud your moral certainty and confidence that you can judge someone's "guilt" from a phone screen. However, when I last checked, America is still governed by the rule of law and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law.
DogMan · 61-69, M
@SunshineGirl yes, you are correct. Nick Shirley nor myself have convicted anyone.
Nick brought it to the attention of the public because the Minnesota Democrats were allowing
the fraud. His videos forced them to do something about it and there were numerous indictments
and convictions. Tim Walz decided after Nicks videos that he could not win another election
because of the fraud he allowed, so he dropped out.
What is it about fraud that you believe should not be investigated? Minnesota was trying to pass
a massive property tax increase, but now they will save over a billion dollars by not having as
much fraud, so they will not have to raise taxes.
Isn't that a good thing? Or would you rather have taxes increased and allow fraud?
Nick brought it to the attention of the public because the Minnesota Democrats were allowing
the fraud. His videos forced them to do something about it and there were numerous indictments
and convictions. Tim Walz decided after Nicks videos that he could not win another election
because of the fraud he allowed, so he dropped out.
What is it about fraud that you believe should not be investigated? Minnesota was trying to pass
a massive property tax increase, but now they will save over a billion dollars by not having as
much fraud, so they will not have to raise taxes.
Isn't that a good thing? Or would you rather have taxes increased and allow fraud?
DogMan · 61-69, M
Could Reduced Fraud in Minnesota Help Lower Property Tax Increases?
Yes — reduced fraud could help lower property tax increases, because fraud is one of the factors Minnesota mayors and local officials cite as driving higher levies.
Why fraud matters for property taxes
A joint letter from 98 Minnesota mayors to state leaders explicitly links “widespread fraud” to the need for higher 2026 property‑tax levies
How reduced fraud could lower tax hikes
If fraud is reduced:
Recovered funds from fraud prevention could offset some of the revenue shortfalls that local governments are trying to cover through higher levies.
Yes — reduced fraud could help lower property tax increases, because fraud is one of the factors Minnesota mayors and local officials cite as driving higher levies.
Why fraud matters for property taxes
A joint letter from 98 Minnesota mayors to state leaders explicitly links “widespread fraud” to the need for higher 2026 property‑tax levies
How reduced fraud could lower tax hikes
If fraud is reduced:
Recovered funds from fraud prevention could offset some of the revenue shortfalls that local governments are trying to cover through higher levies.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
He needs his face slapped.
