Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is the F35 a waste of time and money?

Israel was going to use their F35s to take out the Iranian air defences so 2 waves of conventional aircraft could attack Iran proper. It turns out that Iran has anti stealth capabilities. Israel dumped its bombs 50 miles from the Iranian border when their F35s were locked onto by Iranian air defences. The second and third waves of conventional aircraft never left the tarmac in Israel.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
And what else did al jazeera tell you?
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@sunsporter1649 I dunno. Is a highly placed British diplomat part of al Jazeera? From past events this diplomat is far more accurate in his statements than CNN MSNBC Fox etc.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 In its largest operation ever conducted in Iran, Israel carried out a strategic airstrike on Oct. 26, marking a significant escalation in the conflict between the two countries. The airstrikes targeted critical military infrastructure, delivering both a symbolic and tactical blow to Iran’s strategic capabilities.

"We showed them we could reach any point in Iran. We neutralized air defenses and flew over them, hitting exactly what we wanted without detection," Ram Ben-Barak, former deputy director of the Mossad.

In the early hours of Saturday morning (Israel time), Israeli air force jets struck 20 targets across Iran during the operation’s chosen name, "Days of Repentance." After about four hours, all aircraft returned safely to Israel, marking the operation's successful completion. The air force embarked on a complex mission involving dozens of aircraft, including fighter jets, intelligence, refueling and rescue units. The strikes were conducted at a distance of just under 1,000 miles.

The operation unfolded in three waves: an initial assault on Iran’s air defense systems, followed by targeted strikes by more than 100 airplanes on missile and drone bases and weapons production sites.

Iranian officials, however, downplayed the impact, claiming that only "limited damage" was inflicted on military sites. Yet, according to Maj. Gen. (Res.) Amos Gilad, head of the Institute for Policy and Strategy at Reichman University, "There was an added element of wisdom in this strike; we didn’t humiliate the Iranians. The market in Tehran was open on Saturday as usual, just hours after the attack, because no civilian areas were hit."

While Israel focused exclusively on military and intelligence sites, satellite imagery and independent analysis reveal extensive damage to Iranian installations, particularly missile and drone production centers.

According to Israeli intelligence analyst Ronen Solomon, additional strikes targeted storage and assembly points in Khojir, near Tehran, a site long associated with Iran’s missile development. Solomon said Israel "neutralized components of Iran’s missile production pipeline," cutting off access to vital parts for future production.

Additional strikes hit near Parchin, where Israeli intelligence has long suspected nuclear-related tests. "Israel didn’t strike Iran’s nuclear facilities directly but targeted the infrastructure supporting it," Solomon noted, explaining that this approach allowed Israel to sidestep political barriers while delivering a strong blow to Iran’s military operations.

Solomon added that Israel’s attack impacted Iran’s satellite-launch capabilities, a significant component in Iran’s military satellite program, saying, "Beyond impacting their missile program, their ability to launch satellites for military purposes was damaged."

Gilad noted that, "The American F-35 jets involved represent fifth-generation capabilities, which add an essential layer of defense against Iran. The U.S. has shown exceptional support, including sending THAAD defense batteries. The U.S.-Israel alliance is crucial, and I say it isn’t ironclad; it’s steelclad, because steel doesn’t rust."
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 And you buy into al jazeera. Too funny
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@sunsporter1649 I don't watch or listen to al jazeera. I don't even have TV. I gave my source as a British Diplomat with close ties to the Israeli government.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 Ram Ben-Barak, former deputy director of the Mossad

Maj. Gen. (Res.) Amos Gilad, head of the Institute for Policy and Strategy at Reichman University

Israeli intelligence analyst Ronen Solomon
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@sunsporter1649 Yawn. So you expect the truth from one side of the war? Really? Too Funny!!!! Why not ask Tim Walz how Kamala Harris is doing in the election war.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 And that from someone who cites an "unnamed source"
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@sunsporter1649 You can find him if you stop watching CNN for a few days.