If we just keep making and selling weapons eventual someone has to use those weapons?
Otherwise why make and buy/sell more.
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
exchrist · 31-35
@sunsporter1649 maybe but i think throwing knives sedative darts and bow and arrow would suffice
spjennifer · 61-69, T
@sunsporter1649 Ah yes ole sundowner, have to protect yourselves from those nasty Florida Panthers, all what, 120 of them left now? Frankly I'm amazed that a big ole tough ex-jarhead like you is afraid of a little pussy 🤪💩🦆
Budwick · 70-79, M
Otherwise why make and buy/sell more.
Oh, I don't know.
Compare it to something YOU use.
How many anal vibrators do you have?
Will you buy more?
View 2 more replies »
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
Yup! NATO didn't keep Europe ready for negotiation! Hair trigger-. Thousands of nukes per submarine-. Hawaii just bristling with nukes!
CHINK · 70-79, M
WHY NOT
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
Makes sense to me. When there's a drug problem in an area, they don't go after the people snorting the stuff, they go after the guys making it. When it was decided cigarettes were bad, the government started regulating cigarette manufacturers. Let's extend this logic to the fact that there are so many fucking guns.
exchrist · 31-35
@LordShadowfire yes im referring to the military too but yes there are like 5 guns per person in the us. Wtf