Why are democrats against voter ID, But Mamdami says you need ID to be an emergency snow shoveler?
Supposedly you have to have ID and a social security number to shovel snow, but that is not needed to vote! Does that make sense?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
I registered to vote many years ago, and at that time you did need several forms of ID. I believe the current push is more at the time of voting itself, even if you are registered. Most of us do not carry a birth certificate, or even a passport with us. The memories of the time in Europe where everyone had to carry "papers," is not a pleasant one. The thought leads to fears of voter suppression and a totalitarian state.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@samueltyler2
https://apnews.com/article/bridgeport-connecticut-absentee-ballots-arrests-3ece0f508b718522a107cb5022659414
https://www.ctpublic.org/news/2025-08-17/wanda-geter-pataky-arrested-bridgeport-election
"no one has ever really shown any significant voter fraud in the US!"
https://apnews.com/article/bridgeport-connecticut-absentee-ballots-arrests-3ece0f508b718522a107cb5022659414
https://www.ctpublic.org/news/2025-08-17/wanda-geter-pataky-arrested-bridgeport-election
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Thinkerbell Be serious, Do you consider these significant?
https://apnews.com/article/bridgeport-connecticut-absentee-ballots-arrests-3ece0f508b718522a107cb5022659414 read the report, 5 ballots!
I suggest you read the second one more carefully, it states that there was widespread problems on both sides. but the charges in both are the same, a total of 5 votes!
https://apnews.com/article/bridgeport-connecticut-absentee-ballots-arrests-3ece0f508b718522a107cb5022659414 read the report, 5 ballots!
I suggest you read the second one more carefully, it states that there was widespread problems on both sides. but the charges in both are the same, a total of 5 votes!
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@samueltyler2
It was 5 people who were charged, not 5 ballots. 🙄
Gomes challenged the 2023 primary results in court, and the videos and other evidence led a state judge to order a new primary and general election, both also won by Ganim.
Do suppose a judge would order new elections
on the basis of only 5 ballots? 🙄 🙄 🙄
It was 5 people who were charged, not 5 ballots. 🙄
Gomes challenged the 2023 primary results in court, and the videos and other evidence led a state judge to order a new primary and general election, both also won by Ganim.
Do suppose a judge would order new elections
on the basis of only 5 ballots? 🙄 🙄 🙄
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Thinkerbell Nice try. But your attempt at making this into a major big deal, falls flat on its face!
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@samueltyler2
Not nearly as flat as your clumsy, unread attempt to brush it off.
Do suppose a judge would order new elections
on the basis of only 5 ballots? 🙄 🙄 🙄
Not nearly as flat as your clumsy, unread attempt to brush it off.
Do suppose a judge would order new elections
on the basis of only 5 ballots? 🙄 🙄 🙄
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Thinkerbell Again, nice try. I will ignore your lame attempt to bully me.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@samueltyler2
Translation: you will dodge.
Do suppose a judge would order new elections
on the basis of only 5 ballots? 🙄 🙄 🙄
Translation: you will dodge.
Do suppose a judge would order new elections
on the basis of only 5 ballots? 🙄 🙄 🙄
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Thinkerbell I did not dodge, I have seen zero evidence of any meaningful voter fraud in any posting by any of you so called patriots!
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@samueltyler2
Do suppose a judge would order new elections
on the basis of only 5 ballots? 🙄 🙄 🙄
Dodger.
Do suppose a judge would order new elections
on the basis of only 5 ballots? 🙄 🙄 🙄
Dodger.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Thinkerbell Why not? If there is enough noise then the easiest thing would be to order a repeat, and who won that? Any change?
Get the thought of conspiracy out of your head, it doesn't exist!
Get the thought of conspiracy out of your head, it doesn't exist!
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@samueltyler2
Again you dodged and/or didn't read, party liner.
"Gomes challenged the 2023 primary results in court, and the videos and other evidence led a state judge to order a new primary and general election, both also won by Ganim."
It wasn't the "fuss," it was the videos and other evidence that caused the re-votes, and that also led to the arrest of the crooks on the videos.
The outcome was unchanged, but unfortunately the articles didn't say by how much the vote count changed, so you can breathe a sigh of relief.
Again you dodged and/or didn't read, party liner.
"Gomes challenged the 2023 primary results in court, and the videos and other evidence led a state judge to order a new primary and general election, both also won by Ganim."
It wasn't the "fuss," it was the videos and other evidence that caused the re-votes, and that also led to the arrest of the crooks on the videos.
The outcome was unchanged, but unfortunately the articles didn't say by how much the vote count changed, so you can breathe a sigh of relief.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Thinkerbell the basis of the case was not what you claim. It had to do with who can bring a completed valid ballot into the election. There are strict rules coverring that. It isnt necessarily true fraud.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@samueltyler2
And every time your nonsense gets called out, you try to grasshopper away to some other nonsense.
First it was "five ballots."
Then it was " the judge ordered a re-vote because of the fuss."
Now it's "strict rules" about "valid ballots."
And WHY are there "strict rules"? Supposedly so that ballot harvesters don't cull out the ballots where the people they told how to fill out their ballots voted for the wrong candidate, or stuff the drop boxes with ballots the harvesters filled out themselves, for example. Which is precisely why the 5 miscreants in Bridgeport were arrested. Ballots that have been tampered with are not "valid."
As if you didn't know. 🙄
And every time your nonsense gets called out, you try to grasshopper away to some other nonsense.
First it was "five ballots."
Then it was " the judge ordered a re-vote because of the fuss."
Now it's "strict rules" about "valid ballots."
And WHY are there "strict rules"? Supposedly so that ballot harvesters don't cull out the ballots where the people they told how to fill out their ballots voted for the wrong candidate, or stuff the drop boxes with ballots the harvesters filled out themselves, for example. Which is precisely why the 5 miscreants in Bridgeport were arrested. Ballots that have been tampered with are not "valid."
As if you didn't know. 🙄
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Thinkerbell You are either a bot, or you really drank the Koolade. Grow up!
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Thinkerbell you are showing how uninformed you are!
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@samueltyler2
Au contraire, Monsieur, I showed up your ignorance three times, as you bumbled your way from one piece of abject nonsense to another, as anyone who reads our conversation above can see for themself.
Au contraire, Monsieur, I showed up your ignorance three times, as you bumbled your way from one piece of abject nonsense to another, as anyone who reads our conversation above can see for themself.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Thinkerbell you are delusional. Have a good life.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@Thinkerbell i am too much of a gentleman to tell you what i think of you.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
