Faux News? senior Fox News figures knew after 2020 election voter fraud claims were false
Poll - Total Votes: 17
Fox is an Ethical news outlet
Fox is primarily porpaganda and opinon
most major media are more interested in proift than informing us
there are still many reputable news outlets, I will name some below
news as it was once known is dead or dying.
I think the reporting workd is still doing its job
You may vote on multiple answers.
Fox and its producers and performers were lying as part of their business model.
Fox News’s repetition of Donald Trump’s lie that his 2020 defeat by Joe Biden was the result of electoral fraud, including claims about Dominion voting machines.
the filing “establishes that Fox was not only reckless” but also that producers, owners and personalities were “deliberately lying and knew they were lying about the nature of Dominion’s machines and the supposed way they could be manipulated
Filed last week, the 192-page court review document makes it clear that senior figures at Fox News from[i] Rupert Murdoch down knew immediately after the election that claims of voter fraud, in particular those aimed at Dominion, were false.[/i]
about the dominion story :
Tucker Carlson : “ludicrous” and “off the rails”
Sean Hannity texted about “F’ing lunatics”
You’re allowed to be biased … you’re allowed to try to make money. And people should be able to disagree with each other in a newsroom. But if Fox anchors say they don’t believe X and then turn around and endorse X on air after expressing manifest disbelief in it, they have a real problem
but will this make any difference to the loyal Faux news Watchers?
stay tuned for further developments
Fox News’s repetition of Donald Trump’s lie that his 2020 defeat by Joe Biden was the result of electoral fraud, including claims about Dominion voting machines.
the filing “establishes that Fox was not only reckless” but also that producers, owners and personalities were “deliberately lying and knew they were lying about the nature of Dominion’s machines and the supposed way they could be manipulated
Filed last week, the 192-page court review document makes it clear that senior figures at Fox News from[i] Rupert Murdoch down knew immediately after the election that claims of voter fraud, in particular those aimed at Dominion, were false.[/i]
about the dominion story :
Tucker Carlson : “ludicrous” and “off the rails”
Sean Hannity texted about “F’ing lunatics”
You’re allowed to be biased … you’re allowed to try to make money. And people should be able to disagree with each other in a newsroom. But if Fox anchors say they don’t believe X and then turn around and endorse X on air after expressing manifest disbelief in it, they have a real problem
but will this make any difference to the loyal Faux news Watchers?
stay tuned for further developments
