Ah, I see. It is the leak that is appalling, not the blatant violation of women's reproductive rights.

[big][center]John Roberts calls Supreme Court leak 'absolutely appalling'[/center][/big]

Chief Justice John Roberts said Thursday that the leak of a draft opinion that would strike down Roe v. Wade is "absolutely appalling" and stressed that he hopes "one bad apple" would not change "people's perception" of the nation's highest court and workforce.

In his first public appearance since the leak on Monday, Roberts also said that if "the person" or "people" behind the leak think it will affect the Supreme Court's work they are "foolish."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/05/politics/john-roberts-supreme-court-leak/index.html

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M

Nobody’s rights have been violated. Drafting point and counter point essays and arguments is what SCOTUS judges do .
That’s literally their job .

CorvusBlackthorne · M

@AthrillatheHunt If it is that this draft argument becomes the actual vote, three of the four newest judges will have lied under oath. What then?

AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M

@CorvusBlackthorne feel free to engage in what if scenarios .
Orange filled a LOT of court seats, not just SCOTUS.
If RBG wasn’t so fuxking selfish (yea I said it ) this leak would have not occurred .
(The draft however still would have been written ).

AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M

@CorvusBlackthorne but to answer your question : peoples opinions change over time .

AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M

@CorvusBlackthorne a judge can still be pro life and see this as a states issue too .