Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

For those of you who go hiking.. What type of protection do you have?

I usually carry my .45 on my hip when I am out in the forest. Do those of you who don't carry a gun feel safer when you see someone who is carrying a gun?

If I seen someone in danger in the forest I would not hesitate to use my gun to save them. I feel safer if the people I am with are carrying. Even seeing a random person carrying. Of course I live in the sticks and most people have been hunting.. so there's that.

I know people in the city probably go target shooting at the indoor range if they own a gun.
I was watching some YouTube videos and I had thought about this and decided to ask you all.

Please don't turn this into an argument about gun rights and such.

Thanks in advance for your response.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
* Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense
* Most purported self-defense gun uses are gun uses in escalating arguments, and are both socially undesirable and illegal
* Firearms are used far more often to intimidate than in self-defense
* Criminals who are shot are typically the victims of crime
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/gun-threats-and-self-defense-gun-use-2/

[sep][sep][sep]

Are there "1 to 3 million" defensive gun uses per year in the US?

The "1 to 3 million" figure comes from one "random-digit-dialed telephone survey of 4,977 adults conducted from February through April of 1993" and reported by Kleck & Gertz in 1995. Kleck says the random sampling error of his survey is less than 1%, but if so, that would produce far smaller error bars than 1 to 3 million.

Others have tried to replicate Kleck's data; here's a survey of polling
[quote]https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/gun-threats-and-self-defense-gun-use-2/[/quote]
Needless to say, they produce much smaller numbers and likely have their own biases. But here's a useful quote:

[quote]We analyzed data from two national random-digit-dial surveys conducted under the auspices of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center. Criminal court judges who read the self-reported accounts of the purported self-defense gun use rated a majority as being illegal, even assuming that the respondent had a permit to own and to carry a gun, and that the respondent had described the event honestly from his own perspective.[/quote]
What they're saying, in not so many words, is that guns are often used to intimidate. The guy who draws the gun may think he's preventing a crime. But putting another person in reasonable fear of bodily harm is the crime of assault (battery is when you make contact with the other person). So they're running these stories by judges, who say that many reported "defensive" gun uses are actually the offensive crime of assault, unknown to the gun user.

They also say "8. Criminals who are shot are typically the victims of crime; 9-10. Few criminals are shot by decent law-abiding citizens." i.e. they say it's almost impossible to find a criminal with a gun wound who was shot by a law abiding citizen.

And finally,
[quote]Victims use guns in less than 1% of contact crimes, and women never use guns to protect themselves against sexual assault (in more than 300 cases). Victims using a gun were no less likely to be injured after taking protective action than victims using other forms of protective action. Compared to other protective actions, the National Crime Victimization Surveys provide little evidence that self-defense gun use is uniquely beneficial in reducing the likelihood of injury or property loss.[/quote]

I'm not saying this Harvard data is perfect, but it asks a lot of specific questions about defensive gun use; and the results do tend to completely undermine the Kleck 1993 polling result.

[sep][sep][sep]

Here's the peer reviewed report from the two Harvard surveys:
[b]https://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/6/4/263[/b]

Same author, an analysis of the National Crime Victimization Survey from 2007-2011 covering 14,000 incidents
[b]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091743515001188[/b]
[quote]Results
Of over 14,000 incidents in which the victim was present, 127 (0.9%) involved a SDGU. SDGU was more common among males, in rural areas, away from home, against male offenders and against offenders with a gun. After any protective action, 4.2% of victims were injured; after SDGU, 4.1% of victims were injured. In property crimes, 55.9% of victims who took protective action lost property, 38.5 of SDGU victims lost property, and 34.9% of victims who used a weapon other than a gun lost property.
Conclusions
Compared to other protective actions, the National Crime Victimization Surveys provide little evidence that SDGU is uniquely beneficial in reducing the likelihood of injury or property loss.[/quote]
SDGU = self-defense gun use


America's gun homicides in perspective

homicide rate vs OECD


per capita gun deaths by state red vs blue

gun deaths by state


In the US we have FAR AND AWAY the HIGHEST gun homicide rate in the developed world!!!

The approach of fighting guns with more guns is FAILING!!!
GerOttman · 61-69, M
@ElwoodBlues that's a fine stack o statistics there but none have anything to do with me.
@GerOttman To some benighted people, statistics don't matter until they become one.
GerOttman · 61-69, M
@ElwoodBlues You're making my point, thank you!
fanuc2013 · 51-55, F
@ElwoodBlues So, if you don't want to have a gun, simply DON'T HAVE ONE! You are perfectly within your rights, just as I am within my rights to have one.
@fanuc2013 Tell that to all the kids shot in schools over the past few years. There have been 169 school shootings since 2018 that resulted in injuries or deaths. You are sacrificing other peoples' children in your gun worship.
[b]https://www.edweek.org/leadership/school-shootings-this-year-how-many-and-where/2023/01[/b]

fanuc2013 · 51-55, F
@ElwoodBlues Ok, you tell the woman near where I live, that was attacked and a man tried to drag her into a van. She pulled out her gun, and he and his buddy drove off. What would you say to her?
@fanuc2013 I would say "Madame, carry a Taser!"

Unfortunately, we as a society lose FAR MORE lives from misuse of guns than from the kinds of criminal attacks you describe. That's what all the statistics say, which is why I posted the statistics.

Some people are immune to data and only "learn" from cherry picked anecdotes. I would hope you are not immune to data.
fanuc2013 · 51-55, F
@ElwoodBlues Not legal in our state!
fanuc2013 · 51-55, F
@ElwoodBlues Tasers and stun guns are not legal here. You have to take a class and pass a marksmanship test to get a CPL. And , of course, submit your personal information, and your fingerprints, pass a background check and pay the fee!
fanuc2013 · 51-55, F
@ElwoodBlues Statistics can be pushed any way you want depending on your slant. For every stat you put up I can put up the opposite!
@fanuc2013 [quote]For every stat you put up I can put up the opposite![/quote] Well then, please show us the gun stats that contradict what I've posted!