How sexist can SW be bruh

@deadgerbil I would love to expose them but I cannot, as they contacted me in private and I respect that 😅

But this was a rather cute attempt

@sexyjigsaw did they block you after seeing this post

@deadgerbil nah, before 😂
I received the message and was instablocked

@sexyjigsaw brehh and you can't say the name of that person? ._.

@deadgerbil I easily can. I just respect the privacy brem

Something a cutie wouldn't understand 😪

@sexyjigsaw some people don't deserve privacy

Cute of you to offer it to them though

@deadgerbil ouchhhhh
Somebody get the WHAAAMMBULANCE

For YOU

@sexyjigsaw I can't be afflicted with crippling cuteness if I accept it which I do

You writhe and contort in discomfort over you being cute though

Extending this level of respect to that questionable person gives you a 3rd degree cuteness burn

@deadgerbil I'm not cute. You need evidence to support your claim. Matter of fact, I will doubt this like an atheist. I need scientific empirical evidence!!

@sexyjigsaw uhhhh this isn't a scientific claim

It's a philosophical and religious one

It extends beyond the physical universe

When I look into your eyes, I see something cute that can't be identified by science

I don't need evidence for it to be true 😛

@deadgerbil you can't prove a negative but I will doubt this.... like an atheist

Until you get scientific empirical evidence
Because I refuse to use reason in this particular skepticism

@sexyjigsaw what brought atheism into this though

Distraction from you being cute?

@deadgerbil glad you asked. I think their inconsistency would be of significant advantage to me, as I can freely now use this criteria of scirntific empirical evidence requirements for something that requires other tools to verify 👀

My application of this renders ys both at a stalemate where you cannot mert my criteria and I get to deny outta my own free will and inconsistency. Because for other desirable things requiring metaphysical tools, I will suddenly accept it 😈
See?
And it is your means of distracting how YOU'RE the cute one between us. Constantly tryna prove himself

@sexyjigsaw I see, like when it comes to the existence of a god in general, like one that exists soley outside of the universe, then yeah it would be silly to demand scientific proof for that.

A problem arises when religious people make extremely specific claims about the world that they want others to believe, for which there should be evidence but there is none(Noah's flood, the earth being 10,000 years old, etc). I also feel like people put too much emphasis on the idea of atheistm. Is there a word for non astrologers? They make equally ridiculous claims about how the stars light-years away affect me personally

All this aside, you're cute

@deadgerbil you understand v_v

And yes. Without tangible proofs and evidences to demonstrate how something is true, we cannot trust such a source. I agree entirely. To show and prove that any source is true, all the claims and proofs and evidences must be true

And it's adorable that you think you can make such a conclusion. Don't make me use my inconsistent skepticism trap card on you