fun4us2b · M
They were interviewed on Graham Norton show this week and they showed trailers - looks pretty good to me...so does Frankenstein
View 4 more replies »
val70 · 56-60
I don't know. Eventually I'll end up watching the movie. Perhaps I'll wait till it's on streaming. I'm of an age that William Wyler's version was often on the television. Laurence Olivier played Heathcliff with an icy, almost demonic energy. That's something that I do remember from the times when watching it as a child. Of course, that movie focused less on the detail of Heathcliff's wrath post Cathy's death, but more so on the sheer complexity of Heathcliff and Cathy's relationship in the first place. If one doesn't mind that it did also completely omitted characters from the book, it nevertheless perfectly captures the very essence of the bleak, chilling, haunting Yorkshire Moors that Bronte described in it. Some claimed that director Wyler was trying to say that both Heathcliff and Catherine were no good, and I must agree with that
CrazyMusicLover · 31-35
No, I've seen the version with Ralph Fiennes which followed the story quite well and that's the one I want to remember. Cathy having dark hair and dark eyes was an important part of the story, by making her blond, I can't even imagine what did they make of it. There was quite strong symbol in how the main characters' appearance was depicted in the book and why the Cathy's daughter was fair-haired.
LavidaRaq · F
@CrazyMusicLover yeah, it was a completely different interpretation.
PatKirby · M
The book is quite gothic, dark, and psychologically intense with emphasis on obsession, revenge, and generational trauma. While the movie is noticeably more raw, realistic, minimalist, and gritty.There is less focus in the book on gothic romanticism and more on emotional realism and social brutality. The book also emphasizes revenge across generations while the movie leaves out the second generation entirely.
Detailed descriptions of the moors describe harsh landscapes that mirror inner turmoil, while the movie takes on a more natural approach in conveying the rough landscapes with muted colors yet still retaining a wild and hostile and environment reinforcing realism over romanticism.
Detailed descriptions of the moors describe harsh landscapes that mirror inner turmoil, while the movie takes on a more natural approach in conveying the rough landscapes with muted colors yet still retaining a wild and hostile and environment reinforcing realism over romanticism.
PatKirby · M
@LavidaRaq
I didn't see it nor read the book.
This was curated from AI. I asked ChatGPT the following: 'What are the main differences between the book original interpretation of Wuthering Heights and the latest movie interpretation?" It gave me the executive summary review above (along with about a page and a half more).
My point being AI provides accurate responses to very complex questions and concepts crystallizng material to its core essence. It read the book and compared it with the 2022 movie it reviewed, all in just a few moments what would've taken most people a couple of days.
I have found this useful and quite valuable as, for example, I've made proper investments and executed trades that would've taken me months to learn on my own. People downplay AI left and right, but over time, trial and error and my three degrees in computer science have convinced me there are positive applications. We just have to keep things, as they proverbially say, on the up and up. You should dive deep yourself. Good luck.
I didn't see it nor read the book.
This was curated from AI. I asked ChatGPT the following: 'What are the main differences between the book original interpretation of Wuthering Heights and the latest movie interpretation?" It gave me the executive summary review above (along with about a page and a half more).
My point being AI provides accurate responses to very complex questions and concepts crystallizng material to its core essence. It read the book and compared it with the 2022 movie it reviewed, all in just a few moments what would've taken most people a couple of days.
I have found this useful and quite valuable as, for example, I've made proper investments and executed trades that would've taken me months to learn on my own. People downplay AI left and right, but over time, trial and error and my three degrees in computer science have convinced me there are positive applications. We just have to keep things, as they proverbially say, on the up and up. You should dive deep yourself. Good luck.
PatKirby · M
@LavidaRaq
Point we'll taken. Now that you mention it, looking back I do recall the let down I felt from watching the screen series adaptation of Edgar Allen Poe's 1839 Fall of the House of Usher. It in no way did justice to Poe's original story. Now Poe's short story here was similar to Wuthering Heights in that it was a work of Gothic fiction dealing with themes of madness, family, isolation, and metaphysical identities.
Then there's Alan Parson's musical interpretation of Poe's Fall in his album Tales of Mystery and Imagination (that totally engrossed me that I wrote a critique for my high school paper I was fortunate they actually published).
[media=https://youtu.be/5hymsPLuBWk]
But the recent screen series rendition of Fall was an incredible let down.The characters seemed superficial and forced as well as the theme just not dark enough and a bit flippant.
Gothic bodies of work from that era do something for me so now that I've become aware of the differences between the book's original interpretation of Wuthering Heights and the latest movie interpretation perhaps I'll review it myself and see what transpires. Thanks for the recommendation!
Point we'll taken. Now that you mention it, looking back I do recall the let down I felt from watching the screen series adaptation of Edgar Allen Poe's 1839 Fall of the House of Usher. It in no way did justice to Poe's original story. Now Poe's short story here was similar to Wuthering Heights in that it was a work of Gothic fiction dealing with themes of madness, family, isolation, and metaphysical identities.
Then there's Alan Parson's musical interpretation of Poe's Fall in his album Tales of Mystery and Imagination (that totally engrossed me that I wrote a critique for my high school paper I was fortunate they actually published).
[media=https://youtu.be/5hymsPLuBWk]
But the recent screen series rendition of Fall was an incredible let down.The characters seemed superficial and forced as well as the theme just not dark enough and a bit flippant.
Gothic bodies of work from that era do something for me so now that I've become aware of the differences between the book's original interpretation of Wuthering Heights and the latest movie interpretation perhaps I'll review it myself and see what transpires. Thanks for the recommendation!
I enjoyed it a lot, the whole cinema was left sobbing at the end. It’s not true to the book but it’s never claimed to be.
LavidaRaq · F
@Notladylike that’s awesome. I did too. Would love to see it again.
Amandapower · 26-30, F
Ahhh I still haven't seen it. I was planning to go watch it this weekend then plans changed. Was it good?
LavidaRaq · F
@Amandapower I thought it was pretty good. But you really need to go in with an open mind, not expecting it to be the same as the book.
Amandapower · 26-30, F
@LavidaRaq definitely!
https://similarworlds.com/movies/5485505-Anxiously-waiting-for-this-movie-to-come-out
https://similarworlds.com/movies/5485505-Anxiously-waiting-for-this-movie-to-come-out
RodneyTrotter1 · 100+, M
I overheard a customer at work today saying she was going to see it and that it had been described as '50 Shades of Bronte'.
RodneyTrotter1 · 100+, M
@LavidaRaq Apparently the 2011 version is the most believable so I might watch that instead of the 2009 one.
Just googled Project Hail Mary, it sounds like good escapism for those who are into sci fi. Perhaps I should give that genre another chance.
Just googled Project Hail Mary, it sounds like good escapism for those who are into sci fi. Perhaps I should give that genre another chance.
LavidaRaq · F
@RodneyTrotter1 if you have audible, listen to the book. It’s Soo good.
RodneyTrotter1 · 100+, M
@LavidaRaq I've never listened to an audio book so, as they say, no time like the present! I'll look audible and give it a try. Thanks for the idea 🙂
LadyBronte · 61-69, F
I wondered if it was good. I'll probably watch it when it comes out on one of the streaming platforms I subscribe to.
LavidaRaq · F
@LadyBronte I will probably rewatch as well, when it comes out and I can watch at home.
NewBeginnings7790 · 41-45, F
I really wanna go see it!!
LavidaRaq · F
@NewBeginnings7790 you need to go ☺
Jenny1234 · 56-60, F
I would like to watch it
ScreamingFox · 41-45, F
I'm excited and plan to watch it
LavidaRaq · F
@ScreamingFox I hope you like it 🙂
EndlessHorizon · 46-50, M
I’m so tired of both of these actors. I’ll be skipping this one.
LavidaRaq · F
@EndlessHorizon yeah I can understand that. It will be on Netflix at some point.
SleepingWithGhosts · 46-50, M
That dude was great in the new Frankenstein movie, but I have no desire to see this film.
LavidaRaq · F
@SleepingWithGhosts I rarely go to the movies, so that’s one I’ll be waiting to watch at home. Hopefully soon.
















