@
bijouxbroussard Well... the entire goal of both movies is not a history lesson. One portrays a romance between a stuck up stupid woman that makes a lot of bad descisions and even gets people killed, with an overly manly almost heroic romantic that chases his own wants but at some point allows himself to fall in love. And the other depicts a children story of a couple of kids that grow up in the south and loose themselves in a fantasy world that is created by the slave that is friendly to them and tells them stories.
Both are romantic stories, and both are drenched in this romantic southern simplistic world where everything is good and fine because no one cares about the slaves which are seen as property. For the author of "Gone with the Wind"... that's incredibly clear. It's romanticism, it's not meant to be real and thus it downplays the stains in favor of a cleaned up fantasy version. It's only dangerous when people start seeing it as a history lesson, if you are aware what it is, then you can still enjoy the narrative without the greater scheme. If slavery however would have been romanticised instead of being put on the background... I think that would be more problematic for the movie. Just like your example of the KKK, you can have the characters in the book look up to the KKK because they were from the south and had that mindset, that doesn't mean that the director can't portray the cruelty of it all... But he decided to cut it out completely.