Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Jaws and the USS Indianapolis story.

The '75 blockbuster Jaws is celebrating its 50th anniversary. Many, like myself, saw the film when it came to our local theaters in '75. Many of you were introduced to the film via physical media, showings on tv, and revivals.

Jaws has many memorable moments, and perhaps one that gets a lot of attention, fuels lengthy discussions, and is often quoted by fans, is the monologue by Quint, about the sinking of the Indianapolis, and his recollection of surviving the ordeal.

*Of note, for some reason he gives the date as June 29, 1945, when the actual date is July 30, 1945. I am at a loss as to how the filmmakers made this mistake and did not correct it.

Of course there was no crewman Herbie Robinson from Cleveland, this was fabricated for effect. Quint also says that the mission was so secret, nobody sent a distress signal....which is not true, as the signal was ignored by a intoxicated radio commander.

We then come to the shark attacks as being the main cause of death.

The following is quite lengthy,and detailed, and I do not present it here to malign what I consider to be the greatest adventure film ever made. I do it to simply bring to light the facts and honor those who died, as well as those who survived.


Looking Beyond The Sharks: The Legacy of the USS Indianapolis.

July 29, 2016 | By Richard Hulver, Ph.D., Naval History and Heritage Command, Histories and Archives Division.

Remembering Indianapolis primarily as the sunken ship whose survivors were attacked by sharks obscures the whole story of a decorated American warship that played a vital role in the Pacific victory. Focusing on the sharks unduly directs attention away from the complete story of the final crew's ordeal. The Sailors and Marines that went in the water from Indianapolis faced terrible travails" sharks, dehydration, wounds, mental collapse, and a feeling that their service abandoned them. Some died bravely, some managed to survive, all were heroes who faced unimaginable dangers to protect and serve.

Separating Fact From Fiction.

The majority of the 800-plus Sailors and Marines who went into the water, and spent 4-5 days adrift, died from wounds sustained in the torpedo explosions that sunk the ship and by drowning caused by overexposure and dehydration. Sailors and Marines survived by forming groups in the water. The largest groups were composed of over one-hundred men who had no life rafts and few, or no, supplies. These groups organized themselves around floater nets, connected themselves with life vests, and rotated time in life rafts (if they were a group fortunate enough to have rafts) depending on their condition. As men became increasingly dehydrated and the severity of injuries worsened, death tolls increased. The life preservers of fatalities were commonly removed and the deceased body let loose from the group to sink.

Deaths associated with severe dehydration were the most common and sorrowful stories from survivors. Many men suffered from hallucinations as their conditions worsened. Some swam off alone to reach mirages, attacked shipmates who they mistook for Japanese enemies to the point of exhaustion, or succumbed to thirst and quickened their death by drinking salt water. Often, hallucinations were contagious. One man in the largest group
reported that he had found the stern of Indianapolis just below the surface, entered it, and drank large amounts of fresh milk. This resulted in others swimming below the surface to drink ocean water and drown.

Sharks certainly are a part of the Indianapolis story. Capt. Charles McVay, III ended up in a small group of survivors with a life raft. He reported in an interview months after his rescue that a shark with a sun bleached dorsal fin followed their raft around for days. The shark caused annoyance more than fear, as it stymied the survivors' ability to catch any food because it chased away fish. McVay also noted that he heard of sharks causing more serious trouble for his crew in the water many of them reported to him afterwards of seeing the sharks swim below them in calm water. McVay visited two of his crew in the hospital with shark bites, and joked with one that if he wanted anyone to believe that he was bitten by a shark he better take some castellan paint and outline the[shark bite] before it healed. Lt. Cmdr. Lewis Haynes, the Medical Officer for Indianapolis, was adrift with the largest group of survivors. In an interview with him after the sinking he was somewhat confused as to why the sharks had become such a prominent piece of the story. Out of his 110 hours in the water, he recalled seeing only one shark, but did feel numerous unknown bumps against his body during the nights.

"Sharks certainly took the lives of men in the water, but historic records indicate that they fed on the dead more so than the living."

If sharks were not responsible for taking the lives of most men in the water, why have they obtained such a prominent place in the Indianapolis story? The traumatic experience of being exposed to shark attacks certainly became a defining moment for the survivors who experienced them. Another part of the answer likely comes from reports of the rescue crews. When pilot Lt. Adrian Marks
arrived on the scene of Lt. Cmdr. Haynes's group in his PBY Catalina plane he saw sharks swimming among the survivors feeding on remains. The presence of sharks was part of the reason he decided to make a dangerous sea landing. Nearly all of the rescue ships arriving to the search area reported picking up remains badly mutilated by sharks, some to the point of being primarily skeletal. Crew of the USS Helm (DEb367) had to fire at sharks with rifles to get them away from the dead before pulling them on deck for identification. Sharks certainly took the lives of men in the water, but historic records indicate that they fed on the dead more than the living. Lt. Cmdr. Haynes read over the rescue reports and deduced that sharks must have left his group alone because they were satisfied with the remains. The grim scene that rescuers arrived to, and recorded, amplified the
presence of sharks in the story. Sharks inevitably came to dominate the way Indianapolis was remembered.

The USS Indianapolis should not be synonymous with shark attacks. The ship earned ten battle stars for her service in WWII and was credited with shooting down nine enemy planes. She was out of her home port, Pearl Harbor, for training on December 7, 1941 but was part of the task group formed immediately after the attack to search for the Japanese aircraft carriers responsible. She was a fixture in nearly all of the major Pacific battles, often serving as the flagship for the Fifth Fleet. The atomic components delivered by her contributed to the end of the war in the Pacific.

"Some died bravely, some managed to survive, all were heroes who faced unimaginable dangers to protect and serve."

Remembering Indianapolis primarily as the sunken ship whose survivors were attacked by sharks obscures the whole story of a decorated American warship that played a vital role in the Pacific victory. Focusing on the sharks unduly directs attention away from the complete story of the final crew's ordeal. The Sailors and Marines that went in the water from Indianapolis faced terrible travails" sharks, dehydration, wounds, mental collapse, and a feeling that their service abandoned them. Some died bravely, some managed to survive, all were heroes who faced unimaginable dangers to protect and serve.

Note:
Dr. Richard Hulver is a historian in the Histories and Archives Branch of Naval History and Heritage Command. He is leading a project to revisit the sinking of USS Indianapolis and make historic material readily available to the public and Navy that tells the whole story of the loss.

*The screen writers used a book as reference for the USS Indianapolis story told by Quint.
Ordeal By Sea: The Tragedy of the USS Indianapolis by Thomas Helms.
The author gives the wrong date, and unfortunately, it was not fact checked.
Top | New | Old
craig7 · 70-79, M
Yes,I've noted the incorrect date of June 29,1945 given in the movie - it could be the case that Robert Shaw simply said the wrong date,June instead of July.As his monologue was such a dramatic acting highlight at that point of the movie,the director may not have been inclined to ask for a re-take - if the error was even noticed at that point.
JSul3 · 70-79
@craig7 One would think that having survived such an ordeal, he would know the date.

It's a stain on an otherwise great monologue. How could they screw it up?
You actually saw this film at the theaters? Wow, that was an awesome experience. They don't make films like Jaws anymore.
JSul3 · 70-79
@Jokersswild Yes ..in fact saw it 17 times!
Why you ask? The audience reactions often were lengthy and drowned out some of the dialog, plus I like to examine what's happening with folks in the background and spot any mistakes...like the number of barrels changing during the chase of the shark, and the 2 falling stars, that were special effects.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
The story of the Indianapolis is tragic, but the events in JAWS are more generally based on a series of attacks a Great White made along the NJ coast and rivers of Matawan/Aberdeen NJ in the early 1900s.
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@ChipmunkErnie often attributed to a Bull shark. smaller but not by much, more aggressive and more common in coastal estuaries.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@GerOttman Could be -- somewhere out there is a documentary about the attacks.
JSul3 · 70-79
Further research indicates that Spielberg himself was not aware of the story, and was using a book that gave the incorrect date of the tragedy.

It would be good to know what the title of this book is.

 
Post Comment