Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Tim Burton, His Film Ed Wood, and The Big Lie

What would say, or what would you do, were you to see one of your favorite actors being wrongfully portrayed in a movie, and you know that the falsehoods are likely being accepted as factual by many who viewed it?

It has been 30 years since Tim Burton brought his biopic of a grade z movie maker, who was an alcoholic, and enjoyed cross-dressing, to the screen. The film is ED WOOD, and stars Johnny Depp. Also starring as Bela Lugosi, is character actor Martin Landau.

Now we all know that all movies are really make believe. Many are adapted from books, and many changes occur from the page to the screen. Even those based on historical events, are reworked or take liberties with the truth, to the point that in time, people have a tendency to accept these movies as truth and fact, when they are not.

I love movies, especially the classic monster films of the 30s and 40s. I have read and collected a number of books on the people involved in the making of many of these films.

My rant is with the depiction of Bela Lugosi in Ed Wood.

The film Ed Wood is presented as a biopic, not a comedy or parody.

Whenever I see any comments or photos on various web sites of this film or of the actor, there are always a number of participants who enjoy quoting some of the profane dialog attributed to Lugosi, from the film.

Do those folks believe it as factual? Are they simply being cute and enjoy posting profanity?

Allow me to set the record straight. The presentation of Bela Lugosi as a foul mouthed old man, spewing profanity at his whim, is total BS! It has been debunked by his son. It has been called out by other actors who worked with him. The profanity directed at Boris Karloff in the film, has been debunked not only by Lugosi's son, Bela Jr, but also by Boris Karloff's daughter, Sara.

This 'rivalry' between Lugosi and Karloff was mainly created by the Hollywood studio and the press corps. While it is true, that Karloff had the better career than Lugosi, there is no indication of dislike by either actor. They respected each other.
Yes, they were different! Lugosi was Hungarian. Karloff was British. They enjoyed different things. Karloff liked cricket, Lugosi liked soccer....etc. They were both professionals and charter members of the Screen Actors Guild.

It is well documented that Lugosi was a sick man during the last years of his life. It is a well known fact that earlier in his life he developed sciatica in his legs and grew an addiction to the prescribed treatment morphine. He was also the first actor to go public with his addiction and place himself into a hospital for rehab. It is true that he liked to drink and became an alcoholic (as was Ed Wood, but that is conveniently omitted in the film).

I will not deny that Bela Lugosi was far from perfect. That would be absurd. All of our favorites have flaws. They are human, as we all are, and have their shortcomings.

What I refuse to accept, is the false and terrible depiction of Lugosi in the film Ed Wood. I have searched for comments by Tim Burton about his film and specifically about his interpretation of Lugosi, during his association with Wood. So far, I have come up empty, but have not given up. My search continues.

It has been 30 years since the film debuted.
In that 30 years, has this false depiction of Bela Lugosi now become fact in the minds and hearts of the public?

I hope not.....but I will promise this: I will continue to debunk this false narrative about Bela Lugosi, until my last breath.

Thank you for reading.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Zaphod42 · 51-55, M
Dude, it’s a movie. Fiction. Not for a moment did it come across as a biography of anyone.

Actually, the only part I even remember is when Ed is hanging off the side of the building, held up only by the stitching in his pants, which he had ordered single stitch only. But then it turns out the tailor was a nice guy and gave him double stitching anyway, and that saves his life.(?) I can’t remember anything else so he may have fallen to his death regardless 🤷‍♂️😂
JSul3 · 70-79
@Zaphod42 The movie is classified as a biographical comedy, based upon events from Wood's relationship and the films they made.

So....what impression did you get about actor Bela Lugosi?
@JSul3 Exactly! This is based upon a real person, not a made up character.
Zaphod42 · 51-55, M
@JSul3 I didn’t get one of the actor, outside of his ability to portray the character 🤷‍♂️
JSul3 · 70-79
@Zaphod42 Did you think/believe that Lugosi was a vulgar spewing man?
Zaphod42 · 51-55, M
@JSul3 I don’t know how much clearer I can make my opinion. It was a movie. It had actors playing various parts. The parts were played well, but in no way represented the actors playing them, nor was it documentary on any persons portrayed in the film. It was a work of fiction. Period.
@Zaphod42 ...based upon actual people.

Like Bela.
Zaphod42 · 51-55, M
@SomeMichGuy as much as 8 Mile was based on the real life of Eminem, or Texas Chainsaw Massacre was based on Ed Gein, sure.
@Zaphod42 Those accounts were primarily about those main people, right?

Ed Wood isn't primarily about Lugosi, but he is apparently misdepicted; he's a supporting character who is used to abuse the legacy of the actual man.

What if some friend you knew became famous and you became a character--with your REAL/KNOWN NAME--in a "treatment" which inverted all the things which were important to you...

Would you be fine with that?
Zaphod42 · 51-55, M
@SomeMichGuy Look, OP asked my opinion if that movie made me think worse of Bela for the portrayal. I have, in many ways now, given a definitive NO as my answer. If you want to continue to be bent out of shape about a twisted portrayal of a minor background character which is loosely based on a real person with obvious extreme liberties taken for the sake of the narrative, then be my guest.
JSul3 · 70-79
@Zaphod42 I hardly see Lugosi as a secondary character.

It wouldn't have been too hard to consult with Lugosi's son before making a pathetic decision to portray him as Burton did. No excuse for it.