This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ButterRobot · 51-55, M
where did you get that statistic from ?
Genieinabottle · 51-55, M
@ButterRobot Candace Owens.
revenant · F
@ButterRobot you can google it easily
ButterRobot · 51-55, M
@revenant yes, i found it. Inferred from the total number assumed to have COVID as distinct from the positive tests.
revenant · F
@ButterRobot it has always been the same percentage from the start.
ButterRobot · 51-55, M
@revenant just thinking that through - so what would you say happened in, say, Italy ?
revenant · F
@ButterRobot I never said it did not exist. There are different strands also. Yes some areas got hit more badly and remember the majority of people affected were in their old age. I am not in those areas so why should I live my days scared ? Living is a risk on its own and we all take risks everyday even when we cross the road.
Punches · 46-50, F
@revenant Not only that but everything that happens otherwise, they say, "experts are worried about how this will affect the spread of covid".
I keep hearing, "Starting on such and such date, some place/company will require masks". My thought is, "ARE there any places left that do NOT already require it?"
I remember in the 80's when they acted exactly this way over AIDS. And sadly, they tried to drag out the fear for years.
I keep hearing, "Starting on such and such date, some place/company will require masks". My thought is, "ARE there any places left that do NOT already require it?"
I remember in the 80's when they acted exactly this way over AIDS. And sadly, they tried to drag out the fear for years.