@
automx03 It's your post and I am not going to try to upstage you as that is not proper etiquette.
I started grade school in 1962. Giel shad to wear dresses or a blouse and skirt. No shorts, no sneakers, and they definately were not allowed jeaans as jeans we re NOT IN THE WOMEN's department until the late 70's! No women would be caught dead in jeans. That was male attire and were $4-5 a pair. Cheap. The ONLY girls that got a pas wearing jeans were farm girls and poor girls. Cutoff back them were male jeans cut off. So she had to buy them in the men's dept. In 1968 the women's liberation movement became loud and activists began to force changes. That fall in school the girsl came back as tomboys! Mo more dresses and no more skirts and blouses. And they wore sneakers that were men's. I know exactly when it started as I lived it.
And these girls were shedding their femininity! At least what they knew of it. It was a conscience effort to BE MALE because they COULD!
That same battle he is now facing now! BUT--feminists are FAR more organized than any make group is! Or will be. So he will have a much harder road than she did.
A pullover top or blouse wouod be as comfortable to him as her so the idea of wearing clothes for comfort does not equate. If she wear his clothes for comfort so should he wear her clothes for the same reason and it should be fine! It's not. He is held to a double standard while she gets a pass.
It began about gender and gender bending. But "Real Women" is not a slur as "Real MAn" is.
For a male cross dresser it IS about sex. it is about a taboo, a fetish, and a desire to be as a woman!
For her who is one is IS NOT about sex. She is not putting on his band tee and jeans and converse shoes. His belt, baseball hat and his jacket and then lying down as she brings her self to orgasm. not gonna happen! To her is IS about gender and not sex.
And what she can get away with!
however you are allowed to you rown opinion.
