This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly Adult
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is being gay/lesbian normal/natural?

Now I don't mean to sound ignorant or mean or offend anyone. And before people get all judgemental and start rwporting me just know my bestfriend is a lesbian whom I openly support and encourage to live her life her way. It's just that I wonder, isn't it against nature to have feelings for the same sex? Shouldn't opposites attract? Isn't that supposed to be the basic design of nature?

P.S: Please channel your efforts into healthy debates and discussion rather than irrational abuses and hate.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
Appeal to nature is a logical fallacy, but you find homosexuality in all almost all animals. What's more is just because something is "natural" doesn't mean it's better. Tsunamis are natural, so is poison ivy.
Pfuzylogic · M
@basilfawlty89
Animals also eat their young.
The functions of natural reproduction shows the designed function of reproductive organs.
@basilfawlty89
but you find homosexuality in all almost all animals.

You also find cancer in almost all animals.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays exactly going to my point, appeal to nature is stupid, you need to look at harm. Homosexuality harms no one.
Pfuzylogic · M
You have no scientific evidence to back up your argument. Try to divert your point as you may, homosexuality in animals proves absolutely nothing.
@basilfawlty89 It might also be adaptive from an evolutionary standpoint.

[image/video - please log in to see this content]
@basilfawlty89 well the gay gene, if there was one, would have legitimized homosexuality because it would have been natural
Pfuzylogic · M
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP
But how does that even enter the conversation when once it was confirmed that one didn’t exist the LGBTQ community leadership still asserted it wasn’t a choice. I look to the procreational function and not a gene.
@Pfuzylogic it doesn't even matter that there wasn't one. There mere anticipation of one was enough to normalize the lifestyle
Pfuzylogic · M
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP
I don’t agree at any level that it was normalized. The term that the gay predators used was “latent” back in the 70s before all of the aggressive LBGTQ terms used to attack heterosexuals.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@Pfuzylogic how's your homophobic tinfoil hat? Showing it exists in nearly every specie shows it's natural
Pfuzylogic · M
@basilfawlty89 instead of using hostile LGBTQ terms; why don’t you say something civil that contains meaning. You can’t use facts so you use weak pathetic insults.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@Pfuzylogic like you insult a whole group of marginalized people who don't harm you at all?
Pfuzylogic · M
@basilfawlty89
I refuted your silly point about how you defend something as natural and then you break down because you realize how valid your argument was. That is hardly attacking any marginalized group. It means that you need to think with real facts.