Should you arrest judges?
Poll - Total Votes: 15
Judges should be jailed
Judges should not be jailed
You can only vote on one answer.
If you don't agree with a judgment should judges be jailed?
Jenny1234 · 56-60, F
I think the question needs a little more depth. There’s always going to be one person in every court case that does not agree with the judge’s judgment. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that the judge’s judgement is wrong.
However, if the judge is making a decision that is not in accordance with the law or the statute, then that’s a problem and that’s where the judge’s judgement would be wrong and just for the judge to be jailed. Now there’s a Saturday afternoon tongue twister for you.
However, if the judge is making a decision that is not in accordance with the law or the statute, then that’s a problem and that’s where the judge’s judgement would be wrong and just for the judge to be jailed. Now there’s a Saturday afternoon tongue twister for you.
bowman81 · M
I have arrested a judge for drunk driving and took a complaint against another for felonious assault that resulted in his conviction, removal from office and incarceration. Judges most certainly can be and should be arrested and prosecuted when they break the law.
There is nothing new here. Judges are human and they screw up. They have always been subject to arrest and prosecution when they break the law.
There is nothing new here. Judges are human and they screw up. They have always been subject to arrest and prosecution when they break the law.
bijouxbroussard · F
@bowman81 Totally agree, but it’s the second question that’s a bit more problematic. 🥺
ElwoodBlues · M
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@JimboSaturn Like trying to forgive student loans or vaccine mandates?
ElwoodBlues · M
@MrBrownstone Student loan forgiveness is legal when they meet the criteria set out in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, passed by Congress and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2007. Biden went outside those guidelines briefly, and was corrected. All the subsequent loans forgiveness met the Bush PSLF guidelines.
Vaccine mandates: In 1905, the Supreme Court case Jacobson v. Massachusetts upheld the state's power to mandate smallpox vaccination, even if it infringed on individual liberty. It's been settled law for 120 years now.
Got any more erroneous notions you need corrected??
Vaccine mandates: In 1905, the Supreme Court case Jacobson v. Massachusetts upheld the state's power to mandate smallpox vaccination, even if it infringed on individual liberty. It's been settled law for 120 years now.
Got any more erroneous notions you need corrected??
FloorGenAdm · 51-55, M
FloorGenAdm · 51-55, M
@FloorGenAdm [media=https://youtu.be/7HwBEJG2zHw]
SomeMichGuy · M
Whoever is saying they should be jailed doesn't understand the rule of law.
rinkydinkydoink · M
View 3 more replies »
rinkydinkydoink · M
bijouxbroussard · F
@rinkydinkydoink Wow, and no profanity or sexual references—just criticism of the president. Censorship here is a fact, now. Even with VIP.
🥺
🥺
rinkydinkydoink · M
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
No, that's the start of a slippery road to autocracy.
bijouxbroussard · F
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
Sure. If one breaks the law.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
HARBORING A FUGITIVE
DailyFlash · 56-60, M
bijouxbroussard · F
@DailyFlash Indeed.
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
yea. including el salvador and guantanamo visit.
Moneyonmymind · 31-35, M
no because if that were the case, nearly all of them would be jailed