Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
He has been a disappointment .

This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Roberts had the reputation of being conservative prior to becoming a Supreme Court justice, but hasn't been very conservative since. I have a friend who is a law professor at U of Iowa...he says you don't really know how they are going to rule until they get there. Amy Commie Barrett has been a total bust as well, but the signs were there. A Bush-ite and recommended by McConnell. Thomas and Alito are the only two who are reliable.
This should help explain it…
We may be a great country, but our laws do not necessarily work in the best interests of the country and its citizens.
SilverF0x · 51-55, M
His job isn’t to favor conservative policies but to ensure policies are lawful. This was bound to happen.
Thrust · 56-60, M
There are at least 3 other paths the president can take to lay out similar appropriate tariffs.

This was hardly unexpected
cherokeepatti · 70-79, F
I always thought his smile was fake and creepy. Never trusted him.
ineedadrink · 56-60, M
The Supreme Court is supposed to be the guardians of the constitution, not any particular politician's agenda.
4meAndyou · F
@ineedadrink Very true. But there was a bit of disagreement regarding the ruling.

"Justice Brett Kavanaugh called the Supreme Court’s decision striking down Trump’s emergency tariffs "illogical" in a fiery dissent on Friday and offered a roadmap of alternatives for Trump to attempt to carry out his signature economic policy.

Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, said the 6-3 majority cherry-picked ways in which Trump could regulate imports under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, making what he said was a textualist case that the law already allows similar forms of regulation on imports, including quotas and embargoes. Tariffs are not just in the same category as those but are a "far more modest" alternative to them, Kavanaugh said.

"If quotas and embargoes are a means to regulate importation, how are tariffs not a means to regulate importation? Nothing in the text supports such an illogical distinction," Kavanaugh wrote."
SilverF0x · 51-55, M
@4meAndyou I found this interesting. Neil Gorsuch explains why he voted against tariffs.

https://reason.com/2026/02/20/gorsuch-blasts-thomas-alito-and-kavanaugh-for-favoring-trumps-illegal-tariffs/
4meAndyou · F
@SilverF0x Biden vs. Nebraska? Revolutionary War? The guy is REALLY reaching to try to justify his position.
cherokeepatti · 70-79, F
This is the type of thing that makes you wonder how deep the Swamp really is. This is the highest level of the justice system.
4meAndyou · F
@cherokeepatti They are saying that Trump will BURN him at the State of the Union Address. Roberts and the Justices will be sitting RIGHT in front of him.
cherokeepatti · 70-79, F
@4meAndyou This is one SOTU address that we will remember.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
A bald headed comb over pipsqueak baboon.

 
Post Comment