Anyone cheering about the EPA getting weakened by the supreme court...
Should be made to live next to the power plants, and chemical plants, and factories that they want to see unregulated.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
LamontCranston · M
@MethDozer Again, you disparage, insult and patronize and are wrong. I quoted you exactly, sir.
I said the role of the court has been modified due to the growth of the federal government. I assert again (!) that its role has always been essential.
I fear that your avatar is a very good reflection of your character, sir.
I said the role of the court has been modified due to the growth of the federal government. I assert again (!) that its role has always been essential.
I fear that your avatar is a very good reflection of your character, sir.
MethDozer · M
@LamontCranston Calling out a moving of the goal posts and a bad faith arguement for what they are is not a disparaging insult.
You quoted what I have said yet you're reading of it and turning it into a denial that SC had no vital role at all is incorrect or hasn't always been essential and shows a lack of reading comprehension or you moving the goal posts intentionally. Which one is it?
You quoted what I have said yet you're reading of it and turning it into a denial that SC had no vital role at all is incorrect or hasn't always been essential and shows a lack of reading comprehension or you moving the goal posts intentionally. Which one is it?
LamontCranston · M
@MethDozer OK. Bye.