If a guy was with a girl that was age of consent, 22 and 17, see mentioned wanting to stop during sex. He continue for another half minute to a minute. And he spoke to her later about this and put it in writing exactly what I'm explaining. If there's no statute of limitations in that state for a felony would she have any success in prosecuting? Or rather would this be rape?
• the full, actual facts of the case • the specific jurisdiction's ▪ laws about rape, including the definition of it, esp. with regards to any "degree" ▪ case law • the locality's prosecutor • the quality of representation available
If "no" means "no" even when a guy is beginning to orgasm...then guys need to have legal consent forms, I guess, since a strategic "no" could be an elaborate "ruined orgasm" attack..
Im dissapointed and concerned with the replies. I suppose it's hard to understand why somebody would hold something in for so long. And then the other person's expected to be held responsible for it after all that time. It just doesn't seem fair. But technically I suppose it is fair.
If they are the age of consent but he kept going then it is rape, just not statutory rape. But if they were from two different states the age of consent defaults to 18.