I can’t believe that they needed a grand jury to decide if the police officer should not be charged with a crime. The officer used deadly force against this man who was accused of raping a woman and a teenage girl. He fled the scene and the police were called, he had ran out of the house naked. He was holding a pistol and police used deadly force against him. Why would they need a grand jury to decide to let the police officer off?
It's the law, and in many cases, it's merely just going through the process. Any death not by natural causes must be investigated, and in a case where the death was caused by another person, a grand jury must give the case its due diligence, if only to "no bill" it later.
I cannot understand why you even need a grand jury, it seems a waste of time and money. In Australia they are charged, bail is a option, and go to trial with a jury
@nedkelly I agree, the man fit the description, was naked when he left the crime scene, was naked when the police found him, and holding a handgun, which is was likely intending to use. Police will yell “Drop the gun” and if a suspect doesn’t they’ll be toast. He was accused of raping a teenage girl and a woman repeatedly, was drugging his wife and doing it and I don’t know about the girl. Probably did that while the wife was still drugged. A real waste of air.
