This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
damselfly · 100+, F
I suspect cock is derived from firearms terminology such as "going off half cocked," "cock-up" etc. And tits would be "teats" said with certain regional accents, that have entered the language via the slang route. Ass is prissy American terminology for the more down to earth original "arse" but it still means donkey in Britain, although we understand. Pussy I cant explain. Interestingly the naughtiest word of all, beginning with C, used at one time ( before I was born) to be the correct (medical) terminology for vulva. Nowadays people say vagina and mean the vulva AND the vagina, which I personally find annoying
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@damselfly The word "cock" also means a "tap", or "valve"; as in "stop-cock" (your home's water isolating valve), "try-cock" (a water-level test-valve); etc.
I wonder if the fire-arms "cock" was originally a fanciful comparison of its shape on a flint-lock gun, with the fleshy comb on a cockerel's head.
I wonder if the fire-arms "cock" was originally a fanciful comparison of its shape on a flint-lock gun, with the fleshy comb on a cockerel's head.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@damselfly Saves having to invent ones needlessly where the meaning is obvious from the context, I suppose.
The key to unlocking the curious alternative uses of a simple word is to examine its likely etymology and historical context.
What I do find far more strange is the fad for taking elegant words and mangling them into ugly, clumsy self-parodies, such as "inspi-ray-shun-ul" for "inspiring".
Or for using metaphorically, technical terms without really understanding them, sometimes changing unwittingly but totally the meaning of the message. The classic example is perhaps "epicentre". Also, so many musicians and art critics who ought know better, continue to use acoustic (adjective) for acoustics (noun), and resonant when they mean reverberant.
The key to unlocking the curious alternative uses of a simple word is to examine its likely etymology and historical context.
What I do find far more strange is the fad for taking elegant words and mangling them into ugly, clumsy self-parodies, such as "inspi-ray-shun-ul" for "inspiring".
Or for using metaphorically, technical terms without really understanding them, sometimes changing unwittingly but totally the meaning of the message. The classic example is perhaps "epicentre". Also, so many musicians and art critics who ought know better, continue to use acoustic (adjective) for acoustics (noun), and resonant when they mean reverberant.