This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
I don't see why that should be "controversial", despite some of the swearing and thoughtlessness in some of the responses here.
A matter for genuine debate yes, but not "controversy" if that implies bitter arguments and abuse which only cheapen the matter.
What that figure does show, and please bear in mind I do not know its source nor where it applies, is that anything up to 35% of over-30s in the population surveyed, do not take it seriously. That is - or could be - a very large number of people.
Trying to understand how people react to a pandemic, and their reasons, is an interesting and serious matter that governments and medical services do need consider; but it does seem that the present pandemic and public health generally have become mired in highly-divisive politics in one or two countries, and that mire helps no-one.
A matter for genuine debate yes, but not "controversy" if that implies bitter arguments and abuse which only cheapen the matter.
What that figure does show, and please bear in mind I do not know its source nor where it applies, is that anything up to 35% of over-30s in the population surveyed, do not take it seriously. That is - or could be - a very large number of people.
Trying to understand how people react to a pandemic, and their reasons, is an interesting and serious matter that governments and medical services do need consider; but it does seem that the present pandemic and public health generally have become mired in highly-divisive politics in one or two countries, and that mire helps no-one.