Keepitsimple · 56-60, F
[image/video deleted]
@Keepitsimple cunts will all love him then
Keepitsimple · 56-60, F
@Nunlover Nah, they’ll say he put us in further debt. 🙄
@Keepitsimple yeah probably
HeteroDox · 41-45, F
This would be a strong gesture.... i wonder which gov'ts wont
SecondMarge · F
Show me the money
chrisCA · M
Interesting. I am wondering what the Canadian government is going to offer us.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Keepitsimple · 56-60, F
That $1000 is nothing for us. It won’t stimulate the economy. It will help to keep the utilities on for a month. That’s all.
Gusman · 61-69, M
@Keepitsimple Surely any amount helps?
It will help keep the economy turning over because it will go straight back into the economy.
It will help keep the economy turning over because it will go straight back into the economy.
Keepitsimple · 56-60, F
At the most it will go towards food shopping. I can tell you that 3/4 of my husbands pay is Tips/tokes. I will not be spending it on needless things, that’s for sure. @Gusman
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
It will only work if it is monthly and FOR EVERYONE ...NOT JUST THE ONES the Republicans deem "good people" and not just a one off payment.
$1000 does not cover much. By the time you are done, you can pay some bills but what about food and rent? And what about next month?
Two excuses I saw yesterday to not give us this bill:
Because small businesses cannot pay 2 weeks sick leave. Not even temporarily.
Because the bill says domestic partners are considered in the family part of the bill as people who would receive help. A republican doesn't think those who are "domestic partners" (read gay or unmarried) should get help.
$1000 does not cover much. By the time you are done, you can pay some bills but what about food and rent? And what about next month?
Two excuses I saw yesterday to not give us this bill:
Because small businesses cannot pay 2 weeks sick leave. Not even temporarily.
Because the bill says domestic partners are considered in the family part of the bill as people who would receive help. A republican doesn't think those who are "domestic partners" (read gay or unmarried) should get help.
Gusman · 61-69, M
@JaggedLittlePill
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/prioritizing-covid-19-patients-based-age-likely-wont-fly-us-2020-3?r=US&IR=T
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/prioritizing-covid-19-patients-based-age-likely-wont-fly-us-2020-3?r=US&IR=T
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
@Gusman In the hospital ..
It helps to have all the facts.
They are prioritizing patients who have a clear chance to live over the elderly who will likely not live even with intervention. This is because THEY DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH HOSPITAL BEDS OR STAFF TO KEEP UP. They had to do this.
Stop pushing false rhetoric. It doesn't help.
It helps to have all the facts.
They are prioritizing patients who have a clear chance to live over the elderly who will likely not live even with intervention. This is because THEY DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH HOSPITAL BEDS OR STAFF TO KEEP UP. They had to do this.
Stop pushing false rhetoric. It doesn't help.
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
@Gusman In tough situations, tough calls need to be made.
I dare you to be there making these calls.
I dare you to be there making these calls.







