Social Justice Warriors, commonly referred to as as [sic] SJWs, are people who defend other people in order to have some form of personal benefit. They generally defend those who are played as 'victims' in the case of social media
@Queendragonfly What is the source of that definition ? Because it’s possible to be called a SJW simply for speaking out against social injustice. The logical antithesis of the social justice warrior would be a social injustice warrior, and they certainly exist.
In the U.S. it’s a favorite right-wing slam, so I’m always on guard when I hear it. That and "virtue signaling".
Happened with what? This is my opinion, are you wondering why I have it?
SW-User
@Queendragonfly no, I'm wondering why it even came to mind, I mean it seems like you observed some instance of Social Justice Warfare here, and/or also have specific opinions about SJW's in general, regardless of their individual interaction styles? Like, is an SJW a good thing or a bad thing, broadly speaking?
In general sense. I think it's a bad thing to pretend to be mods and police others while being abusive and to want to contain the concending argue rather than disengaging and report and or mute /block. Oftentimes SJW preach how you should not disengage and how you should fight then too its all just so immature and uneccesary. It helps no one.
That's my view on a SJW in a social platform. They think they are doing heroes work when they're actually just giving mods more work and creating a bad energy for everyone on that platform.