Why do grown people still believe in fairy tales?
Watch out, i have no evidence whatsoever but watch out!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
BlueSkyKing · M
If it’s not science, it’s superstition. No middle ground.
Pfuzylogic · M
BlueSkyKing · M
@Pfuzylogic You’re partially correct. Science has limitations that are set by nature, not humans. Superstition is unlimited due to the human ability to think in abstract. No other creature can do this. Our imagination is the double edge sword.
Pfuzylogic · M
@BlueSkyKing
You give our ancestors way too little credit. Even with their “superstitions” (which I consider a condescending term) they knew as much about science as someone like yourself I would gamble.
You give our ancestors way too little credit. Even with their “superstitions” (which I consider a condescending term) they knew as much about science as someone like yourself I would gamble.
BlueSkyKing · M
@Pfuzylogic Science is a limited method that uses models to explain how nature works. Sure, early astrologers observed and mapped the sky. Alchemy eventually led to chemistry. But not until the development of the scientific method, there was no way to eliminate pseudoscience.
These are the the basics:
Step 1-Question. The "thing" that you want to know. The question you want to answer.
Step 2-Research. Conduct research. Information about the problem.
Step 3-Hypothesis.
Step 4-Experiment. Test the hypothesis.
Step 5-Observations.
Step 6-Results/Conclusion.
Step 7-Communicate. Present/share your results. Replicate.
Claims that can’t be tested are worthless.
These are the the basics:
Step 1-Question. The "thing" that you want to know. The question you want to answer.
Step 2-Research. Conduct research. Information about the problem.
Step 3-Hypothesis.
Step 4-Experiment. Test the hypothesis.
Step 5-Observations.
Step 6-Results/Conclusion.
Step 7-Communicate. Present/share your results. Replicate.
Claims that can’t be tested are worthless.
Pfuzylogic · M
@BlueSkyKing
Thank you for that.
The truth is that many models that are accepted as theories don’t go through that process let alone a thorough error analysis before it is accepted as “truth”.
I present big bang as the most recent victim of pseudo science. Data predicted has not been data received.
Thank you for that.
The truth is that many models that are accepted as theories don’t go through that process let alone a thorough error analysis before it is accepted as “truth”.
I present big bang as the most recent victim of pseudo science. Data predicted has not been data received.
BlueSkyKing · M
@Pfuzylogic The Cosmic Microwave Background radiation is real. Nobel Prizes given to those that found it.
https://www.amnh.org/learn-teach/curriculum-collections/cosmic-horizons-book/cosmic-microwave-background-radiation
https://www.amnh.org/learn-teach/curriculum-collections/cosmic-horizons-book/cosmic-microwave-background-radiation
Pfuzylogic · M
@BlueSkyKing
Then you know what I am talking about.
I really wasn’t sure how sophisticated your back ground in science was. A lot of people will call religion a fairy tale but not know a thing on science.
The CMB provided evidence that the assumption of the universe was expanding was the the source.
Or do you have any idea what I am talking about ?
Then you know what I am talking about.
I really wasn’t sure how sophisticated your back ground in science was. A lot of people will call religion a fairy tale but not know a thing on science.
The CMB provided evidence that the assumption of the universe was expanding was the the source.
Or do you have any idea what I am talking about ?