@
Success It is true that the ability to learn by rote won't mean true comprehension or fair interpretation. But there is no connection between their comprehension or fair interpretation to the ability to learn by rote. Simply because they never allow "the ability to learn by rote" as a tool for interpretation and reasoning. The ability to learn by rote cannot be used for debating and reasoning because its purpose is only for a short-term understanding in order to aim for a short-term achievement (you know what I mean?). And eventually, people will forget what they learn because they just learn by rote. Meanwhile, comprehension and fair interpretation require the long-term observation and understanding of common sense through life experience as well as the knowledge of studying. By that means, they all have to use their common sense, life experiences, knowledge understanding, to express their point of view. There is no "learning by rote" involved in this.
All three of them are learning for their life, which means they cannot learn by rote. The majors that they study is not just applied for test/exam but their career as well. They have to learn it to understand, not to pass. There is no rote in their ability to learn if they know what they need and want to learn for their future.
Smart people never lie to fake their smartness because they already knew they are smart. So why would they need to prove it? I don't think they have time to fake their brain. That is just a waste of time and gains no benefit. Smart people do not have time to focus on that kind of stuff.
