Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Are you worried about climate change? 🤔 Are we causing an extinction event?

Poll - Total Votes: 36
Yes - I am worried. Yes - we are causing an extinction event. No - we will not survive.
Yes - I am worried. No - we are not causing an extinction event. Yes - we will survive.
No - I'm not worried. Yes - we are causing an extinction event. Yes - we will survive regardless.
No - I'm not worried. No - we're not causing an extinction event. Yes - we will survive
No, I'm not worried. Yes, we're causing an extinction event. No, we won't survive.
Show Results
You may vote on multiple answers.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
We should all be living in water world by now ..

Not one prediction has come to pass.. but I’m a denier if I dare question the climate cult..

I’m not buying it.. at all
RedFlower · F
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout it doesnt matter if you believe it.. its a scientific fact
tenente · 100+, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout looking forward to the water world 😍
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@RedFlower yes wealth redistribution religion is fact
scientists..? what a joke.. @RedFlower

All scientists.. ?

or just the ones that push the narrative?
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout they all voted on gravity and decided it does not exist.
I’ve seen plenty of scientists with way more credibility then bill nye give way better arguments against it, then any scientist I’ve seen advocating it.. @MasterLee
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout the very notion of consensus has nothing to do with science
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
Many books and "studies" printed decades ago predicted that by now MANY major cities would be under water..

So far ..0.

The signs at Glacier National Park in Montana that predicted the glacier being gone by 2020 ...

(have been removed)...


Water vapour, H20 (NOT C02) is responsible for up to 70% of the greenhouse effect..

Next they'll be taxing that.


And they ignore the real correlation between CO2 levels and increased global temperature based upon thousands of years worth of ice core samples.
What is that correlation? That global CO2 levels rise AFTER an increase in temperature...
Not before as they like to advertise.


They do not seem to understand climactic cycles, solar cycles, Amount of solar radiation reflected by atmospheric dust via volcanic eruptions, etc...
In the past 4500 years there have been at least 78 major global temperature swings.


The most interesting part is that the COLDEST of these periods lasted from the early 14th century and ended around the mid 19th century. (Known as the Little Ice-Age)

Temperatures have climbed to pre-little ice age levels and they get all crazy with panic.

Also, the WARMEST period was around 1500 BC to 700BC.. Even warmer than the medieval warm period (900 ce to 1300) when Vikings dairy farmed on Greenland when much of the ice melted (pre-industrial revolution, mind you)..


Funny, all those major cities are still above water, parts of the arctic and antarctic are gaining ice as other parts melt, record highs in Greenland this summer coincided with record lows in NW Russia..


I to have no reason to buy something that twists and omits things detrimental to its own credibility.
@SW-User bro. Nobody here will take my ‘ice in the glass challenge’
Basic first grade science..
Ice in a glass of water, measure the level. Then measure again when the ice melts.. presto.. exact same level.. 😎👌
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@SW-User I still remember Carl Sagan telling us that 75% of North America would be glacial ice by 2000.
SW-User
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout If anything when water freezes, it actually EXPANDS..😉