Some so called mainstream scientists think they are more intelligent than creation scientists but they are suffering from Freddy Kruger syndrome

They say the Earth is millions of years old and they can prove it through 'carbolic dating.' So they can prove it using soap eh?

Creation science uses facts to prove the age of the Earth. Clearly the Earth is 6000 years old because if it was 12000 years old we would have used up all the air and water.

Also, if the Earth was millions of years old where are all the bodies?

Checkmate for creation science.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

TrunkZ · 56-60, M

Carbolic dating is the worst. At the end, all you're left with is a broken heart and some suds.

I'm not ready to concede 6000 years yet. Water is plentiful. Just turn on the tap in your house and there is a seemingly never ending supply. There is still plenty a space to keep installing taps on this flat earth of ours.

As for the bodies, have there been any peer reviewed studies regarding how many skeletons can fit in one closet? Do those studies take into account the closets of politicians? Seems like further investigation is indicated.

atlantic59 · 61-69, M

@TrunkZ so much investigation required and you really have to fight for funding

TrunkZ · 56-60, M

@atlantic59 politics and funding are the distasteful parts of science 😔😔