Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Elena05 · F
this is one of those weird questiosn that makes yu pretend smart thinking with an answer of 8... but the real answer here is we cannot know.. any answer bigger then 4 if viable.
the bottom and the sleaves may be sealed shut we cant tell that... the back of the shirt might be one big hole so the 2 front holes are shning through 1 and not 2 holes...
also there might be a very high number of tiny holes in the back which we cannot see.
so yeah anyone claiming its 8 and feeling smart about it is an idiot
the bottom and the sleaves may be sealed shut we cant tell that... the back of the shirt might be one big hole so the 2 front holes are shning through 1 and not 2 holes...
also there might be a very high number of tiny holes in the back which we cannot see.
so yeah anyone claiming its 8 and feeling smart about it is an idiot
@Elena05 There's always one in every thread... 🤦♀️
Straylight · 31-35, F
Trick question. There is no shirt, just an arrangement of pixels.
NerdyPotato · M
At least 7, but maybe more. I'd need to see the back to determine it exactly.
amrit19901990 · 31-35, M
@NerdyPotato 8
NerdyPotato · M
@amrit19901990 how can you possibly know without seeing how many holes there are in the back?
On second thought it, could be as little as 4, as you could consider the entire inside as just one hole.
On second thought it, could be as little as 4, as you could consider the entire inside as just one hole.
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
8
amrit19901990 · 31-35, M
@Thevy29 good job:)
Heartlander · 80-89, M
At least 8, maybe more that recant see.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
6
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
2³
FeetAreFantastic · 41-45, M
8