This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DDonde · 31-35, M
First issue is the claim of the scale of the fraud (enough to overturn the results if true) without evidence.
The second issue is that with the previous, it was used preemptively as an excuse to de-legitimize the results before the election even took place. So that even in the event of a loss, the president would still have a way to victory in theory as long as enough people on his side played ball (He didn't, resulting in the Jan 6th incident). It was anti-democratic and completely unprecedented in American history.
The second issue is that with the previous, it was used preemptively as an excuse to de-legitimize the results before the election even took place. So that even in the event of a loss, the president would still have a way to victory in theory as long as enough people on his side played ball (He didn't, resulting in the Jan 6th incident). It was anti-democratic and completely unprecedented in American history.