Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Wait!! What?!?!

I'm not sure if this excites me about the future or scares the bejesus out of me...


Fun Fact: Lab-grown human and mouse brain cells living in a petri dish became sentient enough to learn to play the video game Pong. That’s right – scientists found that brain cells learn to play Pong, the 1970s tennis-type video game.


***


In news that we don’t find even remotely comforting, brain cells grown in a petri dish have been shown to become sentient enough to learn to play video games. And we’re not kidding when we say that their next plan is to get the brain cells drunk and see what happens.

Sentient brain cells living in a dish
To be clear, these are cells that are living in a petri dish – not a person. They are human cells derived from stem cells and mouse cells derived from embryonic cells. There are 800,000 cells in total involved in the experiment.

Not only have the cells learned to play the game Pong, but they keep improving. “They played longer rallies and were aced less often,” reported The Guardian (cited below). Of course, Pong is a very simple game, which is why the researchers chose it in the first place.

The study that revealed the experiment was just published in the journal Neuron.

The researchers hail from Cortical Labs, Monash University, the University of Melbourne, and University College London.

How can brain cells learn to play Pong?
According to The Guardian, the researchers out the cells on something called the “DishBrain,” “a multi-electrode array that can sense cell activity and stimulate the cells, then gave the cells feedback on whether the paddle was hitting the ball.”

Within five minutes the cells started to communicate using electrical activity to operate the game. It sounds like sci-fi, but it’s true.

“Now the researchers will see how the cells perform when they are drunk or given medicines. They hope to use the DishBrain to learn more about conditions such as epilepsy and dementia.”

“This is the new way to think about what a neuron is,” a researcher said.
— WTF fun facts

[media=https://youtu.be/x0NM7iVo9MQ]


What do you think about this???
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
helenS · 36-40, F
This is a falsehood, an untruth, a whopper and a taradiddle, or to put it in clearer terms: a lie.
sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
@helenS What do you base that on Helen? They have linked to the researchers who conducted the experiments.
Straylight · 31-35, F
@helenS Was this debunked?
helenS · 36-40, F
@Straylight Not that I'm aware of it. Not everything is worth being debunked.
@helenS A taradiddle??? First time I've heard that one!!! 🤣🤣🤣
helenS · 36-40, F
@HootyTheNightOwl taradiddle = pretentious nonsense 😏
@helenS I actually googled about these cells and there's an opinion article debating on if they should have rights or not.

I'm not sure how that would work out in practice, given that they aren't even capable of doing the basics needed to exercise an independent life...
sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
@helenS Here's the published article on PubMed:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36228614/
sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
@HootyTheNightOwl Scary concept. Don't forget there are plenty of living breathing humans who, "aren't even capable of doing the basics needed to exercise an independent life."
helenS · 36-40, F
@sarabee1995 "Applying implications from the theory of active inference via the free energy principle"
That sounds very strange to me. More like L. Ron Hubbard "SF" talk.
Keep in mind that the core of the neuroscience ideology is that the human spirit is just an interaction of nerve cells.
sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
@helenS 🤔

It sounds strange to you because you're familiar with the underlying science and the author appears to be applying it incorrectly??

Or it sounds strange to you because you've never heard of these well-established principles and don't understand their application here??

Or something else?

It seems like you don't want this experiment to have worked. All they did was culture some brain cells and connect them to electrodes to see if they would process information. No different from culturing pancreatic cells to see if they would produce insulin. No one is claiming to have created a human soul.