onewithshoes · 26-30, F
rinkydinkydoink · M
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
rinkydinkydoink · M
@DunningKruger
Your words of encouragement are a big help - - although I was joking. I'm going now 'cause they are good.
Didn't know about the double, though 😋
Your words of encouragement are a big help - - although I was joking. I'm going now 'cause they are good.
Didn't know about the double, though 😋
@DunningKruger Don't know why, but I really enjoyed the way you wrote that. Thank you. 😊
DearAmbellina2113 · 41-45, F
rinkydinkydoink · M
@DearAmbellina2113
A rare good news/bad news comment!
Canada no longer offers the McDonald's Big Breakfast. And the McRib (never got a chance to bite into one of those - but reading how those things were made, that's fine with me) never stuck around all that long.
A rare good news/bad news comment!
Canada no longer offers the McDonald's Big Breakfast. And the McRib (never got a chance to bite into one of those - but reading how those things were made, that's fine with me) never stuck around all that long.
HijabaDabbaDoo · F
tobynshorty · 51-55, F
rinkydinkydoink · M
bijouxbroussard · F
rinkydinkydoink · M
@bijouxbroussard
It is. The coffee cup is well-designed, as well - the coffee's heat remains in the cup where it belongs with the container merely feeling warm to the touch.
It is. The coffee cup is well-designed, as well - the coffee's heat remains in the cup where it belongs with the container merely feeling warm to the touch.
bijouxbroussard · F
@rinkydinkydoink They apparently learned from that famous lawsuit ?
rinkydinkydoink · M
@bijouxbroussard
YES - I remember that. What was the settlement exactly? I seem to recall King's Ransom-like numbers being bandied about.
Here we go.........
The original jury in the Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants case awarded Stella Liebeck $2.9 million, which was later reduced by the judge to $480,000. The parties ultimately settled for an undisclosed amount that was less than the judge's reduction, though news reports indicate it was less than \(\$500,000\).Jury's initial award: A jury awarded Liebeck \(\$200,000\) in compensatory damages, which was reduced to \(\$160,000\) because they found her 20% at fault. They also awarded \(\$2.7\) million in punitive damages, bringing the total to \(\$2.9\) million.Judge's reduction: The trial judge reduced the punitive damages to \(\$480,000\).Final settlement: The parties later settled for a confidential amount, which was reported to be less than \(\$500,000\).
YES - I remember that. What was the settlement exactly? I seem to recall King's Ransom-like numbers being bandied about.
Here we go.........
The original jury in the Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants case awarded Stella Liebeck $2.9 million, which was later reduced by the judge to $480,000. The parties ultimately settled for an undisclosed amount that was less than the judge's reduction, though news reports indicate it was less than \(\$500,000\).Jury's initial award: A jury awarded Liebeck \(\$200,000\) in compensatory damages, which was reduced to \(\$160,000\) because they found her 20% at fault. They also awarded \(\$2.7\) million in punitive damages, bringing the total to \(\$2.9\) million.Judge's reduction: The trial judge reduced the punitive damages to \(\$480,000\).Final settlement: The parties later settled for a confidential amount, which was reported to be less than \(\$500,000\).
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
rinkydinkydoink · M
rinkydinkydoink · M