Is a long term world champion good for WWE RE: Roman Reigns 3 year reign?

I think having a more then long enough champion makes the WWE unwatchable at times. I wonder how fans back then feeled about Hogans 4 year reign or Brunos 7 year reign? Difference was they were both faces while Reigns is a heel and rarely wins clean and always needs help from the Usos or Solo Sioka.

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

IsitevenMe · 51-55, M

Unfortunately it is a marketing machine. As long as that gecko sells insurance they aren’t going to change it. Same thing with Reigns, as long as he brings in advertisers and TV ratings he isn’t going to lose. However, I think we are reaching the peak of where they can keep on doing the same endings and keep viewers. Gotta change things up soon.

smileylovesgaming · 31-35, F

For me I think they should have had both belts defended. Had Cody win one and kept Roman longest on him.

Repete · 61-69, M

I liked Hogan’s era of wrestling better than Reigns ( now) .
My dad wouldn’t miss a match with Bruno .

SW-User

random question. do WWE fans know it's all fake?

Superman88 · 36-40, M

@SW-User yes doesnt mean the storylines dont suck

smileylovesgaming · 31-35, F

@SW-User u do know wrestling has all was been fake

Add a comment...