This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultUpset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Neo-liberals went from "my body my choice," and when that idiom failed, they reduced the unborn baby to "fetal matter."

Another moot argument made by the neo-liberals and baby hating feminists is that victims of rape should be allowed to terminate their pregnancy, Rape accounts for less than 1% of abortion cases, and the abortion laws that are being proposed, and the one currently in place in Texas allows for abortion up to 6 weeks - that's plenty of time for a rape victim to decide if she wants to abort the baby. No, women are not going to die because the law does make an exception for women in those circumstances where their life is in danger.

It's not "your body, your choice." There's also the life of a baby involved. It makes no difference if the baby will be poor. Poor babies have just as much right to life as the affluent. Babies born with physical handicaps have just as much right to life as those who are physically healthy. In India & China, selective abortions have killed millions of female babies - substantially reducing the population of girls, but you don't hear any outcry from the feminists about that.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Imsleepy · 31-35
When people say women are going to die, they are talking about them dying because they will now have to get unsafe abortions and complications can arise, resulting in their death.

It is, their body and their choice.

You don’t hear an outcry about it because it is a moronic argument.
@Imsleepy
When people say women are going to die, they are talking about them dying because they will now have to get unsafe abortions and complications can arise, resulting in their death.

If taking a risk by doing something illegal and immoral results in their death, that's a result of their own stupidity. When making a law, since when do we take into consideration that a person would commit the crime anyway, unsafely? That's not a very good argument. What you're not understanding is the reason the law is put in place to begin with - to protect the life of the unborn child. Apparently, you don't get it.


It is, their body and their choice

The baby doesn't have a body? It's not their body that's being terminated.

You don’t hear an outcry about it because it is a moronic argument.

Oh, so it's okay to selectively abort the female babies so that the male-female ratio is higher?
Imsleepy · 31-35
Subjugating people to idiotic theocratically influenced laws is ignorant and immoral. A person choosing to get an abortion is not immoral. The person carrying the fetus has rights, not the unborn. Apparently, you don’t get it.


It’s okay to abort whatever the person carrying it wants. If government is making that decision, it isn’t a choice. Apparently, you don’t get it. @RocktheHouse
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Imsleepy 100% of the people supporting abortion have already been born
Imsleepy · 31-35
Do your moronic statements ever stop?@sunsporter1649