This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
Well, let me explain things to you...
1. You are either committed to each other or you're not.
2. If neither of you are, then it might be time to move on.
3. If you are, then after 15+ years it's time to become accountable.
It's not a good idea to build a relationship around a fear of commitment.
1. You are either committed to each other or you're not.
2. If neither of you are, then it might be time to move on.
3. If you are, then after 15+ years it's time to become accountable.
It's not a good idea to build a relationship around a fear of commitment.
1-25 of 37
DreamyCrush · F
@MarkPaul Isn't that 15+ years a commitment in itself? The only thing that changes is legalities basically.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@DreamyCrush No. That 15+ years is an arrangement of convenience. Look, I'm not saying there can't be mutual love, respect, and endurance. But, without a formal commitment, there is an underlying issue. Don't be so afraid.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@FCNantes It's not anecdotal. I get that convention tells us "a piece of paper," a solemn vow, an ironclad commitment is meaningless. But, that's anecdotal. A marriage commitment is Bible-based with long-standing results. And, not only is that the best; it's the only "real" solution. Otherwise, it's basically a loving roommate situation.
FCNantes · 22-25, M
@MarkPaul "And, not only is that the best; it's the only "real" solution. Otherwise, it's basically a loving roommate situation."
Unless you give a reasoning for this, you're just making a claim.
How's it the only 'real' solution (& a solution to what?)? Is it otherwise a loving roommate situation?
Unless you give a reasoning for this, you're just making a claim.
How's it the only 'real' solution (& a solution to what?)? Is it otherwise a loving roommate situation?
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@FCNantes I don't know what you are looking for. This is my professional assessment based on studying human nature and the psychology of humans.
Listen... there is more to this (there always is) than 2 people who just don't want to cave into a formal marriage. And, if you think there isn't, then you are more naive then even you realize about yourself. No offense.
Now, when you lock in a commitment you are closing off alternatives. That's pretty heavy stuff. But, unless you are willing to make that kind of commitment, what you basically have is a roommate situation. And, if that's all you want, then you are golden. But, if it isn't what you "really" want, then the SOLUTION is a formal marriage commitment.
See now...?
Listen... there is more to this (there always is) than 2 people who just don't want to cave into a formal marriage. And, if you think there isn't, then you are more naive then even you realize about yourself. No offense.
Now, when you lock in a commitment you are closing off alternatives. That's pretty heavy stuff. But, unless you are willing to make that kind of commitment, what you basically have is a roommate situation. And, if that's all you want, then you are golden. But, if it isn't what you "really" want, then the SOLUTION is a formal marriage commitment.
See now...?
FCNantes · 22-25, M
@MarkPaul I never failed to understand your logic. The problem's the assumptions you're making to make your argument. I suspect they're unfounded.
"Listen... there is more to this (there always is) than 2 people who just don't want to cave into a formal marriage. And, if you think there isn't, then you are more naive then even you realize about yourself. No offense."
I could call you naïve for believing that 100% of couples who choose not to marry have a problematic reason to do so.
That wouldn't make me right.
What you're doing here's making claims. I'd like these claims to be backed up. Otherwise you're just a man saying words.
"Listen... there is more to this (there always is) than 2 people who just don't want to cave into a formal marriage. And, if you think there isn't, then you are more naive then even you realize about yourself. No offense."
I could call you naïve for believing that 100% of couples who choose not to marry have a problematic reason to do so.
That wouldn't make me right.
What you're doing here's making claims. I'd like these claims to be backed up. Otherwise you're just a man saying words.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@FCNantes It's kind of insulting to have you suggesting my qualified assessment is bogus. No, I haven't done detailed primary research on this exact topic. But, I have been studying human nature... and that counts. And, I've been studying the Bible fairly regularly now.
Is it possible 2 people out of a million can act like husband and wife without ever making a formal commitment? Sure, but that is clearly going to be the exception, not the rule.
Look, personally I don't know thing one when it comes to a 15+ year relationship. I haven't had one of those. But, I do know human nature tends to fear commitment, acts differently when there is a commitment, and will tend to rationalize not needing a commitment. And, I can state with assurance that is what is at play here.
Is it possible 2 people out of a million can act like husband and wife without ever making a formal commitment? Sure, but that is clearly going to be the exception, not the rule.
Look, personally I don't know thing one when it comes to a 15+ year relationship. I haven't had one of those. But, I do know human nature tends to fear commitment, acts differently when there is a commitment, and will tend to rationalize not needing a commitment. And, I can state with assurance that is what is at play here.
1-25 of 37