Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Who can we trust in connection with real, honest and straitforward information in connection with Covid-19 ?

I've been hearing and reading all kinds of things so I decided to read up on some recent things published by Doctors of medicine because they are the experts.

Now I'm thinking maybe I shouldn't have done that.
Apparently neurologists in the UK have found some troubling information.

According to them some patients who had mild symptoms and recovered easily then showed later signs of brain and nerve damage in their bodies.

They are worried that another pandemic in connection with brain and nerve damage is going to happen.

WTF ?!?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
4meAndyou · F
I don't think too many sources are trustworthy. We know, now, that the WHO have sold out to the Chinese, so I wouldn't pay too much attention in that quarter.

I grew up with two scientists, and one thing I learned is that they fight among themselves, and seldom agree on anything, (re: published articles, etc.), and they will go to the mats in outrage and wrestle one another over one fine point or another.

Because this virus is exhibiting some surprising traits, and because Wuhan scientists were tampering with it's RNA, (published in 2015), and because China destroyed all the original notes,no one can say definitively how this virus will evolve among its victims. Any scientist or doctor who pontificates upon it and says they believe this or that will happen is probably full of BS.

Over and over again we see "studies" with insufficient numbers, "studies" that have violated known scientific procedures, and retracted studies, such as with the politicization of hydroxychloroquine. We now know it is, contrary to the false retracted study, highly effective as a prophylactic among young, healthy people age 20-50 who are not yet ill. It appears to reduce the death rate among those young and healthy people who contract the virus after taking it to 50% of the previous death rate.
Wraithorn · 51-55, M
@4meAndyou Thanks for answering, although you seem to have made some controversial claims yourself.
4meAndyou · F
@Wraithorn The hydroxychloroquine claim is spot on. The Wuhan article from 2015 is out there.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@4meAndyou even Fauci knew 15 years ago that it was effective on Coronaviruses. He changed his opinion & is pushing a drug that costs over $1000
4meAndyou · F
@cherokeepatti It's all about the money.
SW-User
@4meAndyou They went hard on Trump when he said he was taking hydroxychloroquine but they went awfully silent when a recent study showed positive results for it as a prophylactic.
4meAndyou · F
@SW-User You've got that right. Shut them right up. Trump hatred and the fact that the elite drug companies can't profit from such a cheap drug made them eff us over. My own son refuses to believe me about this drug. Says it will cause heart conditions and stroke.

The Trump haters have caused deaths by doing this. They have caused SO much harm.